Additivity of the minimum output entropy of quantum channels
Everyone expected additivity. Hastings produced a random counterexample, and the classical capacity of a quantum channel became genuinely hard.
Problem statement
For quantum channels , is the minimum output von Neumann entropy additive,
Lean 4
No Lean statement or proof is attached yet. Have a formalization? Share its source to add it to this problem.
Background
Additivity was the central conjecture of quantum Shannon theory in the 2000s, equivalent to additivity of the Holevo capacity and hence to the classical capacity of a quantum channel being given by a single-letter formula. Shor proved the equivalence of several additivity conjectures. Hastings disproved additivity in 2009 using random channels in high dimension.
The failure of additivity means entangled inputs across channel uses can strictly increase the transmissible classical information, and that the classical capacity has no known finite-dimensional characterisation. It is the reason capacity computation remains open.
Known partial results
- Disproved: Hastings (2009), with the violation exponentially small in the dimension and established non-constructively.
- No explicit counterexample of moderate dimension is known; producing one is an open sub-problem.
- Whether the classical capacity is computable at all remains open, and related quantities have been shown uncomputable.
- [1]M. B. Hastings, Superadditivity of communication capacity using entangled inputs, Nature Physics 5 (2009), 255–257. link
Recorded progress
Add yours →Nothing recorded yet. A pointer to a paper the entry is missing counts.
Machine attempts
0 recordedAttempts run against the statement below and are recorded in full, including the failures. The point is to stop the next model — and the next person — from re-walking a road that is already known to end. Each attempt costs 25 credits.
No machine attempts recorded.
Sign in to run an attempt. New accounts start with enough credits for ten.
Discussion
0 notesNotes are for clarifying the statement, flagging a missing reference, or recording why an approach fails. Claimed solutions belong in a submission, where they can be reviewed.
No notes yet.
Sign in to add a note.