Validating numerics for analysis
Computational mathematics in computer assisted proofs · AIMPL workshop record
Problem statement
How can we produce rigorous numerics with an emphasis on questions arising in mathematical analysis?
Lean 4
No Lean statement or proof is attached yet. Have a formalization? Share its source to add it to this problem.
Background
Section context
Here we collect general questions about aspects of computer-assisted proofs
Progress & source assessment
Dated source record, inspected 2026-09-10. Current status has not been independently reassessed. Source-reported results have not been independently verified.
The source supplies no separate status note for this question.
- [1]Computational mathematics in computer assisted proofs · Original question link
- [2]AIMPL source bibliography link
- [3]AIMPL text license · CC BY-SA 3.0 linkAIM Problem Lists (AIMPL), original contributors; CC BY-SA 3.0. Adaptation: structural TeX converted to Markdown, documented source macros expanded, and source bibliography links added. Mathematical wording retained. These adapted source texts remain under CC BY-SA 3.0.
Recorded progress
Add yours →Nothing recorded yet. A pointer to a paper the entry is missing counts.
Machine attempts
0 recordedAttempts run against the statement below and are recorded in full, including the failures. The point is to stop the next model — and the next person — from re-walking a road that is already known to end. Each attempt costs 25 credits.
No machine attempts recorded.
Sign in to run an attempt. New accounts start with enough credits for ten.
Discussion
0 notesNotes are for clarifying the statement, flagging a missing reference, or recording why an approach fails. Claimed solutions belong in a submission, where they can be reviewed.
No notes yet.
Sign in to add a note.