OpenFrontiers
← Back to the index
OP-7568Status unassessedCombinatorics

Arithmetic removal lemma for cyclic groups

Additive combinatorics and its applications · Historical workshop question

Editorial mapping of AIMPL source category: Combinatorics. http://aimpl.org/addcombapp/ Not an author-supplied MSC code.

Historical list · status unassessedAs of 2026-09-08Source & evidence ↓

Problem statement

Obtain improved bound for arithmetic regularity lemma for cyclic groups.

Lean 4

Not yet attached

No Lean statement or proof is attached yet. Have a formalization? Share its source to add it to this problem.

Background

Question context

The arithmetic removal lemma is the following. ∀ε>0,∃δ>0\forall\varepsilon>0, \exists\delta>0 such that if GG is an abelian group and A,B,C⊂GA,B,C\subset G, and suppose there are at least δ∣G∣2\delta|G|^2 solutions to a+b+c=0,a∈A,b∈B,c∈Ca+b+c=0, a\in A, b\in B, c\in C. Then you can remove ε∣G∣\varepsilon|G| elements from each of the sets A,B,CA,B,C so that there are no solutions to a+b+c=0a+b+c=0. In the case of G=FpnG = \mathbb{F}_p^n we know δ=εcp+o(1)\delta = \varepsilon^{c_p+o(1)} where cpc_p is a known absolute constant and this is sharp. In the case of cyclic groups, we know that because of Behrend's construction δ\delta can not be a polynomial in ε\varepsilon. The known bound is however is of tower type.

Progress & source assessment

Historical workshop record. Current open/solved status has not been independently reassessed.

Status note in the source

Suppose we have three sets A={ai:1≤i≤n},B={bi:1≤i≤n},C={ci:1≤i≤n}⊂GA=\{a_i: 1\leq i\leq n\},B=\{b_i: 1\leq i\leq n\},C= \{c_i: 1\leq i\leq n\}\subset G. This triple is called tri-colored sumfree if ai+bj+ck=0  ⟺  i=j=k.a_i+b_j+c_k=0 \iff i=j=k. Obtaining strong upper bounds on the size of tri-colored sum-free sets when GG is a cyclic group would possibly result in an improved arithmetic removal lemma.

References
  1. [1]Additive combinatorics and its applications link

Recorded progress

Add yours →

Nothing recorded yet. A pointer to a paper the entry is missing counts.

Machine attempts

0 recorded

Attempts run against the statement below and are recorded in full, including the failures. The point is to stop the next model — and the next person — from re-walking a road that is already known to end. Each attempt costs 25 credits.

No machine attempts recorded.

Sign in to run an attempt. New accounts start with enough credits for ten.

Discussion

0 notes

Notes are for clarifying the statement, flagging a missing reference, or recording why an approach fails. Claimed solutions belong in a submission, where they can be reviewed.

No notes yet.

Sign in to add a note.