Orbit Equivalence of Measure Preserving Actions · Question 2.2
invariants and their relatives for finitely generated groups · Historical workshop question
Editorial mapping of AIMPL source category: Geometric group theory. http://aimpl.org/l2invariantsgroups/ Not an author-supplied MSC code.
Problem statement
Are the fundamental groups of hyperbolic -manifolds almost treeable?
Lean 4
No Lean statement or proof is attached yet. Have a formalization? Share its source to add it to this problem.
Background
Workshop introduction
This problem list concerns the study of the asymptotic behavior of some natural invariants of finitely generated groups.
Question context
{\bf Definition:} is almost treable if it admits a free action on probability space such that the equivalence relation associated to this action is almost treeable, i.e., it is an increasing union of treeable subequivalence relations.
The property is stable under measure equivalence and taking subgroups. From the property it follows that has the Haagerup property and is sofic. Moreover, if is almost treeable.
Examples include: , where is amenable.
Progress & source assessment
Historical workshop record. Current open/solved status has not been independently reassessed.
Status note in the source
This would be true if we knew that surface groups semidirect product with are strongly almost treeable. By strongly almost treeable we mean that every free probability measure preserving action is almost treeable.
- [1]$L^2$ invariants and their relatives for finitely generated groups link
Recorded progress
Add yours →Nothing recorded yet. A pointer to a paper the entry is missing counts.
Machine attempts
0 recordedAttempts run against the statement below and are recorded in full, including the failures. The point is to stop the next model — and the next person — from re-walking a road that is already known to end. Each attempt costs 25 credits.
No machine attempts recorded.
Sign in to run an attempt. New accounts start with enough credits for ten.
Discussion
0 notesNotes are for clarifying the statement, flagging a missing reference, or recording why an approach fails. Claimed solutions belong in a submission, where they can be reviewed.
No notes yet.
Sign in to add a note.