OpenFrontiers
← Back to the index
OP-8787OpenNumber theory

Erdős #10 · number theory / additive basis

Is there some kk such that every large integer is the sum of a prime and at most kk powers of 2?

Inferred from the community field; finer classification has not been reviewed.

Source reports OPENAs of 2026-09-08Source & evidence ↓

Problem statement

Is there some kk such that every large integer is the sum of a prime and at most kk powers of 2?

Lean 4

No Lean submitted

Formal statement

The formalization is available at the source below; its code is not attached here yet.

On-site verification needs an executable Lean target. None is attached yet.

A source attachment or link is not a verified proof. The statement’s correspondence with the original question needs human review.

Proofs & verification

No Lean has been submitted for this problem yet. A Lean file can be attached to a submission for review, though with no target here it cannot be machine-checked.

Background

Erdős described this as 'probably unattackable'. In [ErGr80] Erdős and Graham suggest that no such kk exists, although in [Er80] Erdős conjectured with 'trepidation' that such a kk does exist.

Gallagher [Ga75] has shown that for any ϵ>0\epsilon>0 there exists k(ϵ)k(\epsilon) such that the set of integers which are the sum of a prime and at most k(ϵ)k(\epsilon) many powers of 2 has lower density at least 1−ϵ1-\epsilon.

Granville and Soundararajan [GrSo98] have conjectured that at most 33 powers of 2 suffice for all odd integers, and hence at most 44 powers of 22 suffice for all even integers. (The restriction to odd integers is important here - for example, Bogdan Grechuk has observed that 11171751461117175146 is not the sum of a prime and at most 33 powers of 22, and pointed out that parity considerations, coupled with the fact that there are many integers not the sum of a prime and 22 powers of 22 (see [9]) suggest that there exist infinitely many even integers which are not the sum of a prime and at most 33 powers of 22).

See also [9], [11], and [16].

Progress & source assessment

The source labels this entry OPEN in the 2026-09-08 snapshot. Editorial progress notes are reproduced as source commentary, not independently verified results. Prize amounts and Lean badges at the source are not local awards or verification.

References
  1. [1]Thomas Bloom (ed.), Erdős Problems #10 link
  2. [2]Upstream Lean 4 statement for Erdős #10 linkExternal statement reference. Not compiled or verified by this platform; upstream files may contain open proof obligations.
  3. [3]Formal Conjectures — Erdős Problem 10 link

Recorded progress

Add yours →

Nothing recorded yet. A pointer to a paper the entry is missing counts.

Machine attempts

0 recorded

Attempts run against the statement below and are recorded in full, including the failures. The point is to stop the next model — and the next person — from re-walking a road that is already known to end. Each attempt costs 25 credits.

No machine attempts recorded.

Sign in to run an attempt. New accounts start with enough credits for ten.

Discussion

0 notes

Notes are for clarifying the statement, flagging a missing reference, or recording why an approach fails. Claimed solutions belong in a submission, where they can be reviewed.

No notes yet.

Sign in to add a note.