OpenFrontiers
← Back to the index

Erdős #1083 · geometry / distances

Let d≥3d\geq 3, and let fd(n)f_d(n) be the minimal mm such that every set of nn points in Rd\mathbb{R}^d determines at least mm distinct distances. Estimate fd(n)f_d(n) - in particular, is it true that

f_d(n)=n^{\frac{2}…
Source reports OPENAs of 2026-09-08Source & evidence ↓

Problem statement

Let d≥3d\geq 3, and let fd(n)f_d(n) be the minimal mm such that every set of nn points in Rd\mathbb{R}^d determines at least mm distinct distances. Estimate fd(n)f_d(n) - in particular, is it true that

fd(n)=n2d−o(1)?f_d(n)=n^{\frac{2}{d}-o(1)}?

Lean 4

No Lean submitted

Formal statement

The formalization is available at the source below; its code is not attached here yet.

On-site verification needs an executable Lean target. None is attached yet.

A source attachment or link is not a verified proof. The statement’s correspondence with the original question needs human review.

Proofs & verification

No Lean has been submitted for this problem yet. A Lean file can be attached to a submission for review, though with no target here it cannot be machine-checked.

Background

A generalisation of the distinct distance problem [89] to higher dimensions. Erdős [Er46b] proved

n1/d≪dfd(n)≪dn2/d,n^{1/d}\ll_d f_d(n)\ll_d n^{2/d},

the upper bound construction being given by a set of lattice points.

  • Clarkson, Edelsbrunner, Gubias, Sharir, and Welzl [CEGSW90] proved f3(n)≫n1/2f_3(n)\gg n^{1/2}.
  • Aronov, Pach, Sharir, and Tardos [APST04] proved fd(n)≫n1d−90/77−o(1)f_d(n)\gg n^{\frac{1}{d-90/77}-o(1)} for any d≥3d\geq 3 (for example, f3(n)≫n0.546f_3(n)\gg n^{0.546}).
  • Solymosi and Vu [SoVu08] proved f3(n)≫n3/5f_3(n) \gg n^{3/5} and
fd(n)≫dn2d−cd2f_d(n)\gg_d n^{\frac{2}{d}-\frac{c}{d^2}}

for all d≥4d\geq 4 for some constant c>0c>0. (The result in their paper for d=3d=3 is slightly weaker than stated here, but uses as a black box the bound for distinct distances in 22 dimensions; we have recorded the consequence of combining their method with the work of Guth and Katz on [89].) The function fd(n)f_d(n) is essentially the inverse of the function gd(n)g_d(n) considered in [1089] - with our definitions, gd(n)>mg_d(n)>m if and only if fd(m)<nf_d(m)<n. The emphasis in this problem is, however, on the behaviour as dd is fixed and n→∞n\to \infty.

Progress & source assessment

The source labels this entry OPEN in the 2026-09-08 snapshot. Editorial progress notes are reproduced as source commentary, not independently verified results. Prize amounts and Lean badges at the source are not local awards or verification.

References
  1. [1]Thomas Bloom (ed.), Erdős Problems #1083 link
  2. [2]Upstream Lean 4 statement for Erdős #1083 linkExternal statement reference. Not compiled or verified by this platform; upstream files may contain open proof obligations.
  3. [3]Formal Conjectures — Erdős Problem 1083 link

Recorded progress

Add yours →

Nothing recorded yet. A pointer to a paper the entry is missing counts.

Machine attempts

0 recorded

Attempts run against the statement below and are recorded in full, including the failures. The point is to stop the next model — and the next person — from re-walking a road that is already known to end. Each attempt costs 25 credits.

No machine attempts recorded.

Sign in to run an attempt. New accounts start with enough credits for ten.

Discussion

0 notes

Notes are for clarifying the statement, flagging a missing reference, or recording why an approach fails. Claimed solutions belong in a submission, where they can be reviewed.

No notes yet.

Sign in to add a note.