OpenFrontiers
← Back to the index
OP-8866OpenCombinatorics

Erdős #160 · additive combinatorics / arithmetic progressions

Let h(N)h(N) be the smallest kk such that {1,…,N}\{1,\ldots,N\} can be coloured with kk colours so that every four-term arithmetic progression must contain at least three distinct colours. Estimate h(N)h(N).

Inferred from the community field; finer classification has not been reviewed.

Source reports OPENAs of 2026-09-08Source & evidence ↓

Problem statement

Let h(N)h(N) be the smallest kk such that {1,…,N}\{1,\ldots,N\} can be coloured with kk colours so that every four-term arithmetic progression must contain at least three distinct colours. Estimate h(N)h(N).

Lean 4

No Lean submitted

Formal statement

The formalization is available at the source below; its code is not attached here yet.

On-site verification needs an executable Lean target. None is attached yet.

A source attachment or link is not a verified proof. The statement’s correspondence with the original question needs human review.

Proofs & verification

No Lean has been submitted for this problem yet. A Lean file can be attached to a submission for review, though with no target here it cannot be machine-checked.

Background

Investigated by Erdős and Freud. This has been discussed on MathOverflow, where LeechLattice shows

h(N)≪N2/3.h(N) \ll N^{2/3}.

In the comments of this site Hunter improves this to

h(N)≪Nlog⁡3log⁡22+o(1)h(N) \ll N^{\frac{\log 3}{\log 22}+o(1)}

(note log⁡3log⁡22≈0.355\frac{\log 3}{\log 22}\approx 0.355).

The observation of Zach Hunter in that question coupled with recent progress on the size of subsets without three-term arithmetic progression (see [BlSi23] which improves slightly on the bounds due to Kelley and Meka [KeMe23]) imply that

h(N)≫exp⁡(c(log⁡N)1/9)h(N) \gg \exp(c(\log N)^{1/9})

for some c>0c>0.

Progress & source assessment

The source labels this entry OPEN in the 2026-09-08 snapshot. Editorial progress notes are reproduced as source commentary, not independently verified results. Prize amounts and Lean badges at the source are not local awards or verification.

References
  1. [1]Thomas Bloom (ed.), Erdős Problems #160 link
  2. [2]Upstream Lean 4 statement for Erdős #160 linkExternal statement reference. Not compiled or verified by this platform; upstream files may contain open proof obligations.
  3. [3]Formal Conjectures — Erdős Problem 160 link

Recorded progress

Add yours →

Nothing recorded yet. A pointer to a paper the entry is missing counts.

Machine attempts

0 recorded

Attempts run against the statement below and are recorded in full, including the failures. The point is to stop the next model — and the next person — from re-walking a road that is already known to end. Each attempt costs 25 credits.

No machine attempts recorded.

Sign in to run an attempt. New accounts start with enough credits for ten.

Discussion

0 notes

Notes are for clarifying the statement, flagging a missing reference, or recording why an approach fails. Claimed solutions belong in a submission, where they can be reviewed.

No notes yet.

Sign in to add a note.