Erdős #176 · additive combinatorics / arithmetic progressions
Let be the minimal such that for any there must exist a -term arithmetic progression such that
Find good up…
Inferred from the community field; finer classification has not been reviewed.
Problem statement
Let be the minimal such that for any there must exist a -term arithmetic progression such that
Find good upper bounds for . Is it true that for any there exists some such that
What about
or
Lean 4
No Lean statement or proof is attached yet. Have a formalization? Share its source to add it to this problem.
Background
When this is the van der Waerden number (see [138]). Spencer [Sp73] has proved that if with odd then
Erdős and Graham write that 'no decent bound' is known even for .
Erdős [Er63d] proved that, for every ,
where as and as .
Hunter in the comment section observes that the local lemma implies an improved bound of
so that in particular as we have, for all large , (where the term as ).
Progress & source assessment
The source labels this entry OPEN in the 2026-09-08 snapshot. Editorial progress notes are reproduced as source commentary, not independently verified results. Prize amounts and Lean badges at the source are not local awards or verification.
- [1]Thomas Bloom (ed.), Erdős Problems #176 link
Recorded progress
Add yours →Nothing recorded yet. A pointer to a paper the entry is missing counts.
Machine attempts
0 recordedAttempts run against the statement below and are recorded in full, including the failures. The point is to stop the next model — and the next person — from re-walking a road that is already known to end. Each attempt costs 25 credits.
No machine attempts recorded.
Sign in to run an attempt. New accounts start with enough credits for ten.
Discussion
0 notesNotes are for clarifying the statement, flagging a missing reference, or recording why an approach fails. Claimed solutions belong in a submission, where they can be reviewed.
No notes yet.
Sign in to add a note.