OpenFrontiers
← Back to the index
OP-8916OpenCombinatorics

Erdős #271 · additive combinatorics / arithmetic progressions

Let A(n)={a0<a1<⋯ }A(n)=\{a_0<a_1<\cdots\} be the sequence defined by a0=0a_0=0 and a1=na_1=n, and for k≥1k\geq 1 define ak+1a_{k+1} as the least positive integer such that there is no three-term arithmetic progression in ${a_0,\ldots,a_{k…

Inferred from the community field; finer classification has not been reviewed.

Source reports OPENAs of 2026-09-08Source & evidence ↓

Problem statement

Let A(n)={a0<a1<⋯ }A(n)=\{a_0<a_1<\cdots\} be the sequence defined by a0=0a_0=0 and a1=na_1=n, and for k≥1k\geq 1 define ak+1a_{k+1} as the least positive integer such that there is no three-term arithmetic progression in {a0,…,ak+1}\{a_0,\ldots,a_{k+1}\}.

Can the aka_k be explicitly determined? How fast do they grow?

Lean 4

Not yet attached

No Lean statement or proof is attached yet. Have a formalization? Share its source to add it to this problem.

Background

It is easy to see that A(1)A(1) is the set of integers which have no 2 in their base 3 expansion. Odlyzko and Stanley [OdSt78] have found similar characterisations are known for A(3k)A(3^k) and A(2⋅3k)A(2\cdot 3^k) for any k≥0k\geq 0 and conjectured in general that such a sequence always eventually either satisfies

ak≍klog⁡23a_k\asymp k^{\log_23}

or

ak≍k2log⁡k.a_k \asymp \frac{k^2}{\log k}.

There is no known sequence which satisfies the second growth rate, but Lindhurst [Li90] gives data which suggests that A(4)A(4) has such growth (A(4)A(4) is given as A005487 in the OEIS).

Moy [Mo11] has proved that, for all such sequences, for all ϵ>0\epsilon>0, ak≤(12+ϵ)k2a_k\leq (\frac{1}{2}+\epsilon)k^2 for all sufficiently large kk. van Doorn and Sothanaphan have noted in the comment section that Moy's proof can be upgraded to give a fully explicit result of

ak≤(k−1)(k+2)2+na_k\leq \frac{(k-1)(k+2)}{2}+n

for all k≥0k\geq 0.

In general, sequences which begin with some initial segment and thereafter are continued in a greedy fashion to avoid three-term arithmetic progressions are known as Stanley sequences.

Progress & source assessment

The source labels this entry OPEN in the 2026-09-08 snapshot. Editorial progress notes are reproduced as source commentary, not independently verified results. Prize amounts and Lean badges at the source are not local awards or verification.

References
  1. [1]Thomas Bloom (ed.), Erdős Problems #271 link

Recorded progress

Add yours →

Nothing recorded yet. A pointer to a paper the entry is missing counts.

Machine attempts

0 recorded

Attempts run against the statement below and are recorded in full, including the failures. The point is to stop the next model — and the next person — from re-walking a road that is already known to end. Each attempt costs 25 credits.

No machine attempts recorded.

Sign in to run an attempt. New accounts start with enough credits for ten.

Discussion

0 notes

Notes are for clarifying the statement, flagging a missing reference, or recording why an approach fails. Claimed solutions belong in a submission, where they can be reviewed.

No notes yet.

Sign in to add a note.