OpenFrontiers
← Back to the index
OP-8917OpenCombinatorics

Erdős #272 · additive combinatorics / arithmetic progressions

Let N≥1N\geq 1. What is the largest tt such that there are A1,…,At⊆{1,…,N}A_1,\ldots,A_t\subseteq \{1,\ldots,N\} with Ai∩AjA_i\cap A_j a non-empty arithmetic progression for all i≠ji\neq j?

Inferred from the community field; finer classification has not been reviewed.

Source reports OPENAs of 2026-09-08Source & evidence ↓

Problem statement

Let N≥1N\geq 1. What is the largest tt such that there are A1,…,At⊆{1,…,N}A_1,\ldots,A_t\subseteq \{1,\ldots,N\} with Ai∩AjA_i\cap A_j a non-empty arithmetic progression for all i≠ji\neq j?

Lean 4

No Lean submitted

Formal statement

The formalization is available at the source below; its code is not attached here yet.

On-site verification needs an executable Lean target. None is attached yet.

A source attachment or link is not a verified proof. The statement’s correspondence with the original question needs human review.

Proofs & verification

No Lean has been submitted for this problem yet. A Lean file can be attached to a submission for review, though with no target here it cannot be machine-checked.

Background

Simonovits and Sós [SiSo81] have shown that t≪N2t\ll N^2.

Erdős and Graham asked whether the maximal tt is achieved when we take the AiA_i to be all arithmetic progressions in {1,…,N}\{1,\ldots,N\} containing some fixed element, 'presumably the integer ⌊N/2⌋\lfloor N/2\rfloor'. This was disproved by Simonovits and Sós [SiSo81], who observed that taking all sets containing at most 33 elements, containing some fixed element, produces (N2)+1\binom{N}{2}+1 many such sets, which is asymptotically greater than the number of arithmetic progressions containing a fixed element, which is ∼π224N2\sim \frac{\pi^2}{24}N^2.

If we drop the non-empty requirement then Graham, Simonovits, and Sós [GSS80] have shown that

t≤(N3)+(N2)+(N1)+1t\leq \binom{N}{3}+\binom{N}{2}+\binom{N}{1}+1

and this is best possible.

Szabo [Sz99] proved that the maximal such tt is equal to

N22+O(N5/3(log⁡N)3),\frac{N^2}{2}+O(N^{5/3}(\log N)^3),

resolving the asymptotic question. On the other hand, Szabo showed that the conjecture of Simonovits and Sós that (n2)+1\binom{n}{2}+1 is best possible is false, giving a construction which yields

t≥(N2)+⌊N−14⌋+1.t \geq \binom{N}{2}+\left\lfloor\frac{N-1}{4}\right\rfloor+1.

Szabo conjectures that the asymptotic t=(N2)+O(N)t=\binom{N}{2}+O(N) holds, and that in any extremal example there is an integer contained in all sets.

Progress & source assessment

The source labels this entry OPEN in the 2026-09-08 snapshot. Editorial progress notes are reproduced as source commentary, not independently verified results. Prize amounts and Lean badges at the source are not local awards or verification.

References
  1. [1]Thomas Bloom (ed.), Erdős Problems #272 link
  2. [2]Upstream Lean 4 statement for Erdős #272 linkExternal statement reference. Not compiled or verified by this platform; upstream files may contain open proof obligations.
  3. [3]Formal Conjectures — Erdős Problem 272 link

Recorded progress

Add yours →

Nothing recorded yet. A pointer to a paper the entry is missing counts.

Machine attempts

0 recorded

Attempts run against the statement below and are recorded in full, including the failures. The point is to stop the next model — and the next person — from re-walking a road that is already known to end. Each attempt costs 25 credits.

No machine attempts recorded.

Sign in to run an attempt. New accounts start with enough credits for ten.

Discussion

0 notes

Notes are for clarifying the statement, flagging a missing reference, or recording why an approach fails. Claimed solutions belong in a submission, where they can be reviewed.

No notes yet.

Sign in to add a note.