Erdős #272 · additive combinatorics / arithmetic progressions
Let . What is the largest such that there are with a non-empty arithmetic progression for all ?
Inferred from the community field; finer classification has not been reviewed.
Problem statement
Let . What is the largest such that there are with a non-empty arithmetic progression for all ?
Lean 4
Formal statement
The formalization is available at the source below; its code is not attached here yet.
- Upstream Lean 4 statement for Erdős #272 ↗
External statement reference. Not compiled or verified by this platform; upstream files may contain open proof obligations.
- Formal Conjectures — Erdős Problem 272 ↗
On-site verification needs an executable Lean target. None is attached yet.
A source attachment or link is not a verified proof. The statement’s correspondence with the original question needs human review.
Proofs & verification
No Lean has been submitted for this problem yet. A Lean file can be attached to a submission for review, though with no target here it cannot be machine-checked.
Background
Simonovits and Sós [SiSo81] have shown that .
Erdős and Graham asked whether the maximal is achieved when we take the to be all arithmetic progressions in containing some fixed element, 'presumably the integer '. This was disproved by Simonovits and Sós [SiSo81], who observed that taking all sets containing at most elements, containing some fixed element, produces many such sets, which is asymptotically greater than the number of arithmetic progressions containing a fixed element, which is .
If we drop the non-empty requirement then Graham, Simonovits, and Sós [GSS80] have shown that
and this is best possible.
Szabo [Sz99] proved that the maximal such is equal to
resolving the asymptotic question. On the other hand, Szabo showed that the conjecture of Simonovits and Sós that is best possible is false, giving a construction which yields
Szabo conjectures that the asymptotic holds, and that in any extremal example there is an integer contained in all sets.
Progress & source assessment
The source labels this entry OPEN in the 2026-09-08 snapshot. Editorial progress notes are reproduced as source commentary, not independently verified results. Prize amounts and Lean badges at the source are not local awards or verification.
Recorded progress
Add yours →Nothing recorded yet. A pointer to a paper the entry is missing counts.
Machine attempts
0 recordedAttempts run against the statement below and are recorded in full, including the failures. The point is to stop the next model — and the next person — from re-walking a road that is already known to end. Each attempt costs 25 credits.
No machine attempts recorded.
Sign in to run an attempt. New accounts start with enough credits for ten.
Discussion
0 notesNotes are for clarifying the statement, flagging a missing reference, or recording why an approach fails. Claimed solutions belong in a submission, where they can be reviewed.
No notes yet.
Sign in to add a note.