OpenFrontiers
← Back to the index

Erdős #668 · geometry / distances

Is it true that the number of incongruent sets of nn points in R2\mathbb{R}^2 which maximise the number of unit distances tends to infinity as n→∞n\to\infty? Is it always >1>1 for n>3n>3?

Source reports OPENAs of 2026-09-08Source & evidence ↓

Problem statement

Is it true that the number of incongruent sets of nn points in R2\mathbb{R}^2 which maximise the number of unit distances tends to infinity as n→∞n\to\infty? Is it always >1>1 for n>3n>3?

Lean 4

Not yet attached

No Lean statement or proof is attached yet. Have a formalization? Share its source to add it to this problem.

Background

In fact this is =1=1 also for n=4n=4, the unique example given by two equilateral triangles joined by an edge.

Computational evidence of Engel, Hammond-Lee, Su, Varga, and Zsámboki [EHSVZ25] and Alexeev, Mixon, and Parshall [AMP25] suggests that this count is =1=1 for various other 5≤n≤215\leq n\leq 21 (although these calculations were checking only up to graph isomorphism, rather than congruency).

The actual maximal number of unit distances is the subject of [90].

Progress & source assessment

The source labels this entry OPEN in the 2026-09-08 snapshot. Editorial progress notes are reproduced as source commentary, not independently verified results. Prize amounts and Lean badges at the source are not local awards or verification.

References
  1. [1]Thomas Bloom (ed.), Erdős Problems #668 link

Recorded progress

Add yours →

Nothing recorded yet. A pointer to a paper the entry is missing counts.

Machine attempts

0 recorded

Attempts run against the statement below and are recorded in full, including the failures. The point is to stop the next model — and the next person — from re-walking a road that is already known to end. Each attempt costs 25 credits.

No machine attempts recorded.

Sign in to run an attempt. New accounts start with enough credits for ten.

Discussion

0 notes

Notes are for clarifying the statement, flagging a missing reference, or recording why an approach fails. Claimed solutions belong in a submission, where they can be reviewed.

No notes yet.

Sign in to add a note.