Erdős #668 · geometry / distances
Is it true that the number of incongruent sets of points in which maximise the number of unit distances tends to infinity as ? Is it always for ?
Problem statement
Is it true that the number of incongruent sets of points in which maximise the number of unit distances tends to infinity as ? Is it always for ?
Lean 4
No Lean statement or proof is attached yet. Have a formalization? Share its source to add it to this problem.
Background
In fact this is also for , the unique example given by two equilateral triangles joined by an edge.
Computational evidence of Engel, Hammond-Lee, Su, Varga, and Zsámboki [EHSVZ25] and Alexeev, Mixon, and Parshall [AMP25] suggests that this count is for various other (although these calculations were checking only up to graph isomorphism, rather than congruency).
The actual maximal number of unit distances is the subject of [90].
Progress & source assessment
The source labels this entry OPEN in the 2026-09-08 snapshot. Editorial progress notes are reproduced as source commentary, not independently verified results. Prize amounts and Lean badges at the source are not local awards or verification.
- [1]Thomas Bloom (ed.), Erdős Problems #668 link
Recorded progress
Add yours →Nothing recorded yet. A pointer to a paper the entry is missing counts.
Machine attempts
0 recordedAttempts run against the statement below and are recorded in full, including the failures. The point is to stop the next model — and the next person — from re-walking a road that is already known to end. Each attempt costs 25 credits.
No machine attempts recorded.
Sign in to run an attempt. New accounts start with enough credits for ten.
Discussion
0 notesNotes are for clarifying the statement, flagging a missing reference, or recording why an approach fails. Claimed solutions belong in a submission, where they can be reviewed.
No notes yet.
Sign in to add a note.