Spectral sets and weak tiling
Spectral sets and weak tiling
Problem statement
exists_nowhereDense_spectralSet
[KLM2023, Problem 7.1] asks whether a bounded, measurable, nowhere dense subset of positive measure can be spectral for every .
isSpectral_right_of_product_three_dimensional
[KLM2023, Problem 7.2] For a three-dimensional convex body and a bounded, measurable set , must spectrality of imply spectrality of ?
isSpectral_right_of_product_of_convexBody
[KLM2023, Problem 7.2] For every positive dimension , a convex body and a bounded, measurable set , must spectrality of imply spectrality of ?
Lean 4
Formal statement
Lean 4/-
Copyright 2026 The Formal Conjectures Authors.
Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the "License");
you may not use this file except in compliance with the License.
You may obtain a copy of the License at
https://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS,
WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied.
See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
limitations under the License.
-/
import FormalConjecturesUtil
/-!
# Spectral sets and weak tiling
This file formalizes Problems 7.1 and 7.2 from Kolountzakis, Lev, and Matolcsi.
*References:*
- [KLM2023] Mihail N. Kolountzakis, Nir Lev, and Máté Matolcsi,
[Spectral sets and weak tiling](https://arxiv.org/abs/2209.04540).
- [GL16] Rachel Greenfeld and Nir Lev, Spectrality and tiling by cylindric domains,
*Journal of Functional Analysis* 271 (2016), 2808–2821.
- [GL20] Rachel Greenfeld and Nir Lev, Spectrality of product domains and Fuglede's conjecture
for convex polytopes, *Journal d'Analyse Mathématique* 140 (2020), 409–441.
-/
open MeasureTheory
namespace NowhereDenseSpectralSet
/--
[KLM2023, Problem 7.1] asks whether a bounded, measurable, nowhere dense subset
$\Omega \subset \mathbb{R}^d$ of positive measure can be spectral for every $d \ge 2$.
-/
@[category research open, AMS 42 46]
theorem exists_nowhereDense_spectralSet :
answer(sorry) ↔ ∀ᵉ (d : ℕ) (hd : 2 ≤ d),
∃ Ω : Set (Fin d → ℝ), Bornology.IsBounded Ω ∧ MeasurableSet Ω ∧
IsNowhereDense Ω ∧ 0 < volume Ω ∧ isSpectral Ω := by
sorry
end NowhereDenseSpectralSet
namespace SpectralSetProduct
/-- The product $A \times B$, represented by consecutive coordinate blocks. -/
def productSet {n m : ℕ} (A : Set (Fin n → ℝ)) (B : Set (Fin m → ℝ)) :
Set (Fin (n + m) → ℝ) :=
{x | (fun i ↦ x (Fin.castAdd m i)) ∈ A ∧ (fun j ↦ x (Fin.natAdd n j)) ∈ B}
/-- Spectrality of a product with an `n`-dimensional convex body forces spectrality of its
bounded, measurable `m`-dimensional right factor. -/
def spectralProductImpliesRightSpectral (n m : ℕ) : Prop :=
∀ (A : ConvexBody (Fin n → ℝ)) (B : Set (Fin m → ℝ)),
Bornology.IsBounded B → MeasurableSet B →
isSpectral (productSet (A : Set (Fin n → ℝ)) B) → isSpectral B
/--
[KLM2023, Problem 7.2; GL16] For a one-dimensional convex body $A$ and a bounded,
measurable set $B$, if $A \times B$ is spectral, then $B$ is spectral.
-/
@[category research solved, AMS 42 46]
theorem isSpectral_right_of_product_one_dimensional :
answer(True) ↔
∀ (m : ℕ), 0 < m → spectralProductImpliesRightSpectral 1 m := by
sorry
/--
[KLM2023, Problem 7.2; GL20] For a two-dimensional convex body $A$ and a bounded,
measurable set $B$, if $A \times B$ is spectral, then $B$ is spectral.
-/
@[category research solved, AMS 42 46]
theorem isSpectral_right_of_product_two_dimensional :
answer(True) ↔
∀ (m : ℕ), 0 < m → spectralProductImpliesRightSpectral 2 m := by
sorry
/--
[KLM2023, Problem 7.2] For a three-dimensional convex body $A$ and a bounded,
measurable set $B$, must spectrality of $A \times B$ imply spectrality of $B$?
-/
@[category research open, AMS 42 46]
theorem isSpectral_right_of_product_three_dimensional :
answer(sorry) ↔
∀ (m : ℕ), 0 < m → spectralProductImpliesRightSpectral 3 m := by
sorry
/--
[KLM2023, Problem 7.2] For every positive dimension $n$, a convex body $A$ and a bounded,
measurable set $B$, must spectrality of $A \times B$ imply spectrality of $B$?
-/
@[category research open, AMS 42 46]
theorem isSpectral_right_of_product_of_convexBody :
answer(sorry) ↔
∀ (n m : ℕ), 0 < n → 0 < m →
spectralProductImpliesRightSpectral n m := by
sorry
end SpectralSetProduct
On-site verification needs an executable Lean target. None is attached yet.
A source attachment or link is not a verified proof. The statement’s correspondence with the original question needs human review.
Proofs & verification
No Lean has been submitted for this problem yet. A Lean file can be attached to a submission for review, though with no target here it cannot be machine-checked.
Background
Source snapshot inspected on 10 September 2026. Subsequent research status and the accuracy of source formalizations have not been independently certified.
Fixed commit b82b08faa9006484021c12005ab41287fb2ffb69. This file contains 3 source-labeled research-open declarations. Other declarations in the attached file can be definitions, solved results or tests. The file is preserved as source material; it has not been compiled or proved by this import.
Copyright The Formal Conjectures Authors. Code: Apache-2.0; other original material: CC BY 4.0. Third-party sources retain their own licenses. Original source files and notices preserved.
Recorded progress
Add yours →Nothing recorded yet. A pointer to a paper the entry is missing counts.
Machine attempts
0 recordedAttempts run against the statement below and are recorded in full, including the failures. The point is to stop the next model — and the next person — from re-walking a road that is already known to end. Each attempt costs 25 credits.
No machine attempts recorded.
Sign in to run an attempt. New accounts start with enough credits for ten.
Discussion
0 notesNotes are for clarifying the statement, flagging a missing reference, or recording why an approach fails. Claimed solutions belong in a submission, where they can be reviewed.
No notes yet.
Sign in to add a note.