OpenFrontiers
← Back to the index
OP-9640Status unassessedAlgebra

Fernandes' conjecture on the 2-generation of even direct product permutation groups

Fernandes' conjecture on the 2-generation of even direct product permutation groups

Specialist source · status unassessedAs of 2026-09-10Source & evidence ↓

Problem statement

conjecture_1

Conjecture 1 (Fernandes, 2026): Let m≥n≥2m \ge n \ge 2 be integers with (m,n)∉{(2,2),(3,3),(4,3),(4,4)}(m, n) \notin \{(2,2), (3,3), (4,3), (4,4)\}. Then the group

Γm⊕n={(σ1,σ2)∈Sm×Sn:sgn(σ1)=sgn(σ2)}\Gamma_{m \oplus n} = \{(\sigma_1, \sigma_2) \in \mathrm{S}_m \times \mathrm{S}_n : \mathrm{sgn}(\sigma_1) = \mathrm{sgn}(\sigma_2)\}

has rank 22, i.e., minimal generating set of size 22.

Note: Fernandes states the conjecture for groups of exact rank 22, which is why (2,2)(2,2) is in the exception list: Γ2⊕2≅C2\Gamma_{2 \oplus 2} \cong C_2 has rank 11. The formalised conclusion ∃ g₁ g₂, closure {g₁, g₂} = ⊤ encodes 2-generation (at most 22 generators), which Γ2⊕2\Gamma_{2 \oplus 2} also satisfies. The other three exceptions (3,3),(4,3),(4,4)(3,3), (4,3), (4,4) have rank 33 and are genuinely not 2-generated.

Lean 4

No Lean submitted

Formal statement

Lean 4
/-
Copyright 2026 The Formal Conjectures Authors.

Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the "License");
you may not use this file except in compliance with the License.
You may obtain a copy of the License at

    https://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0

Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS,
WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied.
See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
limitations under the License.
-/

import FormalConjecturesUtil

/-!
# Fernandes' conjecture on the 2-generation of even direct product permutation groups

*Reference:* [arxiv/2605.12342](https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.12342)
**Groups of permutations that are even on maximal proper subsets, and related monoids**
by *Vítor H. Fernandes*

For positive integers $m, n \ge 2$, let $\mathrm{S}_m \times \mathrm{S}_n$ be the direct product of
symmetric groups on $[m] = \{1, \dots, m\}$ and $[n'] = \{1', \dots, n'\}$. Define
$$
\Gamma_{m \oplus n} = \{(\sigma_1, \sigma_2) \in \mathrm{S}_m \times \mathrm{S}_n :
  \mathrm{sgn}(\sigma_1) = \mathrm{sgn}(\sigma_2)\}
$$
to be the index-$2$ subgroup of pairs of permutations with equal parity, i.e., those whose
product action on $[m] \cup [n']$ is an even permutation.

It is known that $\mathrm{rank}(\Gamma_{2 \oplus 2}) = 1$, $\mathrm{rank}(\Gamma_{3 \oplus 3}) = 3$,
$\mathrm{rank}(\Gamma_{4 \oplus 3}) = 3$, and $\mathrm{rank}(\Gamma_{4 \oplus 4}) = 3$.

**Conjecture 1 (Fernandes, 2026):** For all integers $m \ge n \ge 2$ such that
$(m, n) \notin \{(2,2), (3,3), (4,3), (4,4)\}$, the group $\Gamma_{m \oplus n}$ has
rank $2$ (i.e., is $2$-generated).
-/

namespace Arxiv.«2605.12342»

open Equiv.Perm

/--
The group homomorphism $(\sigma_1, \sigma_2) \mapsto \mathrm{sgn}(\sigma_1) \cdot \mathrm{sgn}(\sigma_2)^{-1}$
from $\mathrm{S}_m \times \mathrm{S}_n$ to $\{+1, -1\}$.

Its kernel is exactly $\Gamma_{m \oplus n}$.
-/
noncomputable def signDiffHom (m n : ℕ) : Equiv.Perm (Fin m) × Equiv.Perm (Fin n) →* ℤˣ :=
  (sign.comp (MonoidHom.fst _ _)) * (sign.comp (MonoidHom.snd _ _))⁻¹

/--
The subgroup $\Gamma_{m \oplus n} \le \mathrm{S}_m \times \mathrm{S}_n$ consisting of all pairs
$(\sigma_1, \sigma_2)$ of permutations with equal signature, i.e.
$\mathrm{sgn}(\sigma_1) = \mathrm{sgn}(\sigma_2)$.

This is the kernel of the sign-difference homomorphism
$(\sigma_1, \sigma_2) \mapsto \mathrm{sgn}(\sigma_1) \cdot \mathrm{sgn}(\sigma_2)^{-1}$,
and is an index-$2$ subgroup of $\mathrm{S}_m \times \mathrm{S}_n$.
-/
noncomputable def gammaSubgroup (m n : ℕ) : Subgroup (Equiv.Perm (Fin m) × Equiv.Perm (Fin n)) :=
  (signDiffHom m n).ker

/--
**Conjecture 1 (Fernandes, 2026):**
Let $m \ge n \ge 2$ be integers with $(m, n) \notin \{(2,2), (3,3), (4,3), (4,4)\}$.
Then the group
$$
\Gamma_{m \oplus n} = \{(\sigma_1, \sigma_2) \in \mathrm{S}_m \times \mathrm{S}_n :
  \mathrm{sgn}(\sigma_1) = \mathrm{sgn}(\sigma_2)\}
$$
has rank $2$, i.e., minimal generating set of size $2$.

Note: Fernandes states the conjecture for groups of exact rank $2$, which is why $(2,2)$
is in the exception list: $\Gamma_{2 \oplus 2} \cong C_2$ has rank $1$. The formalised
conclusion `∃ g₁ g₂, closure {g₁, g₂} = ⊤` encodes 2-generation (at most $2$ generators),
which $\Gamma_{2 \oplus 2}$ also satisfies. The other three exceptions $(3,3), (4,3), (4,4)$
have rank $3$ and are genuinely not 2-generated.
-/
@[category research open, AMS 20]
theorem conjecture_1 {m n : ℕ} (hm2 : 2 ≤ m) (hn2 : 2 ≤ n) (hmn : n ≤ m)
    (h_except : (m, n) ∉ ({(2, 2), (3, 3), (4, 3), (4, 4)} : Set (ℕ × ℕ))) :
    ∃ g₁ g₂ : gammaSubgroup m n, Subgroup.closure {g₁, g₂} = ⊤ := by
  sorry

/--
It is known that $\Gamma_{2 \oplus 2} \cong C_2$ has rank $1$: it is cyclic, generated by a
single element.
-/
@[category research solved, AMS 20]
theorem conjecture_1.variants.rank_2_2 :
    ∃ g : gammaSubgroup 2 2, Subgroup.closure {g} = ⊤ := by
  sorry

/--
It is known that $\Gamma_{3 \oplus 3}$ has rank $3$: it is not $2$-generated.
-/
@[category research solved, AMS 20]
theorem conjecture_1.variants.rank_3_3 :
    ∀ h₁ h₂ : gammaSubgroup 3 3, Subgroup.closure {h₁, h₂} ≠ ⊤ := by
  sorry

/--
It is known that $\Gamma_{4 \oplus 3}$ has rank $3$: it is not $2$-generated.
-/
@[category research solved, AMS 20]
theorem conjecture_1.variants.rank_4_3 :
    ∀ h₁ h₂ : gammaSubgroup 4 3, Subgroup.closure {h₁, h₂} ≠ ⊤ := by
  sorry

/--
It is known that $\Gamma_{4 \oplus 4}$ has rank $3$: it is not $2$-generated.
-/
@[category research solved, AMS 20]
theorem conjecture_1.variants.rank_4_4 :
    ∀ h₁ h₂ : gammaSubgroup 4 4, Subgroup.closure {h₁, h₂} ≠ ⊤ := by
  sorry

end Arxiv.«2605.12342»

On-site verification needs an executable Lean target. None is attached yet.

A source attachment or link is not a verified proof. The statement’s correspondence with the original question needs human review.

Proofs & verification

No Lean has been submitted for this problem yet. A Lean file can be attached to a submission for review, though with no target here it cannot be machine-checked.

Background

Source snapshot inspected on 10 September 2026. Subsequent research status and the accuracy of source formalizations have not been independently certified.

Fixed commit b82b08faa9006484021c12005ab41287fb2ffb69. This file contains 1 source-labeled research-open declarations. Other declarations in the attached file can be definitions, solved results or tests. The file is preserved as source material; it has not been compiled or proved by this import.

Copyright The Formal Conjectures Authors. Code: Apache-2.0; other original material: CC BY 4.0. Third-party sources retain their own licenses. Original source files and notices preserved.

References
  1. [1]Formal Conjectures — Fernandes' conjecture on the 2-generation of even direct product permutation groups link
  2. [2]Original reference cited in the formalization link

Recorded progress

Add yours →

Nothing recorded yet. A pointer to a paper the entry is missing counts.

Machine attempts

0 recorded

Attempts run against the statement below and are recorded in full, including the failures. The point is to stop the next model — and the next person — from re-walking a road that is already known to end. Each attempt costs 25 credits.

No machine attempts recorded.

Sign in to run an attempt. New accounts start with enough credits for ten.

Discussion

0 notes

Notes are for clarifying the statement, flagging a missing reference, or recording why an approach fails. Claimed solutions belong in a submission, where they can be reviewed.

No notes yet.

Sign in to add a note.