OpenFrontiers
← Back to the index
OP-9647Status unassessedAlgebra

The Poisson Conjecture

The Poisson Conjecture

Specialist source · status unassessedAs of 2026-09-10Source & evidence ↓

Problem statement

poisson_conjecture.variants.dimension_one

The Poisson Conjecture in dimension 11 (PC1PC_1) is open. By [AvdE07], Theorem 7, it is implied by the Jacobian conjecture in dimension 22 (Keller's original problem, open) and implies the Dixmier conjecture for the first Weyl algebra (Problem 1 of Dixmier (1968), open).

poisson_conjecture.variants.dimension_two

The Poisson Conjecture in dimension 22 (PC2PC_2) is open. Since the Jacobian conjecture is false in every dimension n≥3n ≥ 3 [Alp26], no known implication bounds PC2PC_2 from above any more; the chain of [AvdE07], Theorem 7 places it as the strongest of the remaining open conjectures PC2⟹DC2⟹JC2⟹PC1⟹DC1PC_2 \Longrightarrow DC_2 \Longrightarrow JC_2 \Longrightarrow PC_1 \Longrightarrow DC_1.

Lean 4

No Lean submitted

Formal statement

Lean 4
/-
Copyright 2026 The Formal Conjectures Authors.

Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the "License");
you may not use this file except in compliance with the License.
You may obtain a copy of the License at

    https://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0

Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS,
WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied.
See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
limitations under the License.
-/

import FormalConjectures.Wikipedia.JacobianConjecture
import FormalConjecturesUtil

/-!
# The Poisson Conjecture

*References:*
- [AvdE07] [arxiv/math.0608009](https://arxiv.org/abs/math/0608009)
  **On the equivalence of the Jacobian, Dixmier and Poisson Conjectures in any characteristic**
  by *Kossivi Adjamagbo, Arno van den Essen*. Published as *A proof of the equivalence of the
  Dixmier, Jacobian and Poisson conjectures*, Acta Math. Vietnam. 32 (2007), 205–214.
- [BCW82] [The Jacobian conjecture: reduction of degree and formal expansion of the inverse](https://doi.org/10.1090/S0273-0979-1982-15032-7)
  by *Hyman Bass, Edwin H. Connell, David Wright*, Bull. Amer. Math. Soc. 7 (1982), 287–330.
- [Alp26] [Counterexample to the Jacobian conjecture](https://x.com/__alpoge__/status/2079028340955197566)
  by *Levent Alpöge* (2026), disproving the Jacobian conjecture in dimension $3$

The Poisson Conjecture $PC_n$ ([AvdE07], Notations 5) asserts that, over a field of
characteristic zero, every endomorphism of the `n`-th canonical Poisson algebra
$P_n(K)$ — the polynomial algebra $K[X_1, \dots, X_{2n}]$ equipped with the canonical
Poisson bracket — is an automorphism.

By [AvdE07], Theorem 7 (the "United Conjectures Theorem"), for every `n` there is a chain
of implications
$$JC_{2n} \Longrightarrow PC_n \Longrightarrow DC_n \Longrightarrow JC_n,$$
where $JC_n$ is the Jacobian Conjecture in dimension `n` and $DC_n$ the Dixmier Conjecture
for the `n`-th Weyl algebra (the implication $DC_n \Longrightarrow JC_n$ being classical [BCW82]).
Since the Jacobian conjecture was disproved in dimension $3$ [Alp26] — and hence in every
dimension $n ≥ 3$ by padding with identity coordinates — $PC_n$ is false for all $n ≥ 3$:
composing the counterexample's failure of $JC_3$ through $PC_3 \Longrightarrow DC_3 \Longrightarrow JC_3$ refutes
$PC_3$, and directly, the cotangent (symplectic) lift of the counterexample map
([AvdE07], Theorem 1 in reverse) is a non-invertible Poisson endomorphism of $P_3(K)$.
The cases $n = 1$ and $n = 2$ remain open.

Indexing note: we index the $2n$ variables of $P_n(K)$ by `Fin n ⊕ Fin n`, with
`Sum.inl i` playing the role of $X_i$ and `Sum.inr i` the role of $X_{i+n}$ of [AvdE07],
so that the canonical bracket reads $\{X_i, X_{i+n}\} = 1$; see
`MvPolynomial.poissonBracket`.
-/

namespace Arxiv.«math.0608009»

open MvPolynomial JacobianConjecture

variable {K : Type*} [Field K] [CharZero K]

/-- A `K`-algebra endomorphism `φ` of the polynomial algebra in $2n$ variables is an
endomorphism of the `n`-th canonical Poisson algebra $P_n(K)$ if it preserves the canonical
Poisson bracket. Following [AvdE07], Lemma 2, it is equivalent to require preservation on
the generators only, which is the form used here (the brackets of generators are constants,
so preserving and intertwining them agree). -/
def IsPoissonEndomorphism {n : ℕ}
    (φ : MvPolynomial (Fin n ⊕ Fin n) K →ₐ[K] MvPolynomial (Fin n ⊕ Fin n) K) : Prop :=
  ∀ v w, poissonBracket (φ (X v)) (φ (X w)) = poissonBracket (X v) (X w)

variable (K) in
/-- The Poisson Conjecture in dimension `n` ($PC_n$ in the notation of [AvdE07]): every
endomorphism of the `n`-th canonical Poisson algebra over `K` is an automorphism.
An endomorphism is an automorphism iff it is bijective, since the inverse of a bijective
algebra endomorphism preserving the Poisson bracket is again such. -/
def PoissonConjectureFor (n : ℕ) : Prop :=
  ∀ φ : MvPolynomial (Fin n ⊕ Fin n) K →ₐ[K] MvPolynomial (Fin n ⊕ Fin n) K,
    IsPoissonEndomorphism φ → Function.Bijective φ

/--
The **Poisson Conjecture** ([AvdE07], the characteristic zero case): for every `n`, every
endomorphism of the `n`-th canonical Poisson algebra over a field `K` of characteristic
zero is an automorphism. This is **false**: the Jacobian conjecture fails in dimension $3$
[Alp26], hence so does $PC_3$ (via [AvdE07], Theorem 7, or directly via the symplectic
lift of the counterexample map).
-/
@[category research solved, AMS 14 17]
theorem poisson_conjecture : ¬ ∀ n, PoissonConjectureFor K n := by
  sorry

/--
The Poisson Conjecture in dimension $1$ ($PC_1$) is open. By [AvdE07], Theorem 7, it is
implied by the Jacobian conjecture in dimension $2$ (Keller's original problem, open) and
implies the Dixmier conjecture for the first Weyl algebra (Problem 1 of Dixmier (1968),
open).
-/
@[category research open, AMS 14 17]
theorem poisson_conjecture.variants.dimension_one : PoissonConjectureFor K 1 := by
  sorry

/--
The Poisson Conjecture in dimension $2$ ($PC_2$) is open. Since the Jacobian conjecture is
false in every dimension $n ≥ 3$ [Alp26], no known implication bounds $PC_2$ from above
any more; the chain of [AvdE07], Theorem 7 places it as the strongest of the remaining
open conjectures $PC_2 \Longrightarrow DC_2 \Longrightarrow JC_2 \Longrightarrow PC_1 \Longrightarrow DC_1$.
-/
@[category research open, AMS 14 17]
theorem poisson_conjecture.variants.dimension_two : PoissonConjectureFor K 2 := by
  sorry

/--
The Poisson Conjecture is false in dimension $3$: the cotangent (symplectic) lift
$\Phi(X_i) = F_i$, $\Phi(X_{i+3}) = \sum_j M_{ij} X_{j+3}$ with $M = (JF)^{-\top}$ of the
degree-$6$ counterexample map $F$ of [Alp26] (whose Jacobian determinant is the constant
$-2$, so $M$ is a polynomial matrix) is a Poisson endomorphism of $P_3(K)$ that is not
injective on points — e.g. it identifies $(0, 6, -142, 0, 0, 0)$ and $(1, 0, 2, 0, 0, 0)$
— and is therefore no automorphism. Alternatively, $PC_3$ fails by [AvdE07], Theorem 7,
as it implies the Jacobian conjecture in dimension $3$, contradicting [Alp26].
-/
@[category research solved, AMS 14 17]
theorem poisson_conjecture.variants.dimension_three : ¬ PoissonConjectureFor K 3 := by
  sorry

/--
The Poisson Conjecture is false in every dimension $n ≥ 3$, by padding the dimension $3$
counterexample with identity coordinates.
-/
@[category research solved, AMS 14 17]
theorem poisson_conjecture.variants.dimension_ge_three (n : ℕ) (hn : 3 ≤ n) :
    ¬ PoissonConjectureFor K n := by
  sorry

/--
The Jacobian conjecture in dimension $2n$ implies the Poisson conjecture in dimension `n`
([AvdE07], Theorem 1 and Theorem 7).
-/
@[category research solved, AMS 14 17]
theorem poisson_conjecture.variants.jacobian_implication (n : ℕ)
    (h : JacobianConjectureProp K (Fin (2 * n))) : PoissonConjectureFor K n := by
  sorry

section Tests

omit [CharZero K] in
/-- The identity is a Poisson endomorphism. -/
@[category test, AMS 17]
theorem isPoissonEndomorphism_id (n : ℕ) :
    IsPoissonEndomorphism (AlgHom.id K (MvPolynomial (Fin n ⊕ Fin n) K)) := by
  intro v w
  simp

omit [CharZero K] in
/-- The canonical bracket pairs each position variable with its momentum variable. -/
@[category test, AMS 17]
theorem poissonBracket_X_pairing (n : ℕ) (i : Fin n) :
    poissonBracket (X (Sum.inl i) : MvPolynomial (Fin n ⊕ Fin n) K) (X (Sum.inr i)) = 1 := by
  simp

omit [CharZero K] in
/-- The Poisson conjecture holds trivially in dimension $0$, where the Poisson algebra is `K`
itself and the identity is the only endomorphism. -/
@[category test, AMS 17]
theorem poissonConjectureFor_zero : PoissonConjectureFor K 0 := by
  intro φ _
  have : φ = AlgHom.id K _ := algHom_ext fun i => i.elim (fun h => h.elim0) fun h => h.elim0
  rw [this]
  exact Function.bijective_id

end Tests

end Arxiv.«math.0608009»

On-site verification needs an executable Lean target. None is attached yet.

A source attachment or link is not a verified proof. The statement’s correspondence with the original question needs human review.

Proofs & verification

No Lean has been submitted for this problem yet. A Lean file can be attached to a submission for review, though with no target here it cannot be machine-checked.

Background

Source snapshot inspected on 10 September 2026. Subsequent research status and the accuracy of source formalizations have not been independently certified.

Fixed commit b82b08faa9006484021c12005ab41287fb2ffb69. This file contains 2 source-labeled research-open declarations. Other declarations in the attached file can be definitions, solved results or tests. The file is preserved as source material; it has not been compiled or proved by this import.

Copyright The Formal Conjectures Authors. Code: Apache-2.0; other original material: CC BY 4.0. Third-party sources retain their own licenses. Original source files and notices preserved.

References
  1. [1]Formal Conjectures — The Poisson Conjecture link
  2. [2]Original reference cited in the formalization link
  3. [3]Original reference cited in the formalization link
  4. [4]Original reference cited in the formalization link

Recorded progress

Add yours →

Nothing recorded yet. A pointer to a paper the entry is missing counts.

Machine attempts

0 recorded

Attempts run against the statement below and are recorded in full, including the failures. The point is to stop the next model — and the next person — from re-walking a road that is already known to end. Each attempt costs 25 credits.

No machine attempts recorded.

Sign in to run an attempt. New accounts start with enough credits for ten.

Discussion

0 notes

Notes are for clarifying the statement, flagging a missing reference, or recording why an approach fails. Claimed solutions belong in a submission, where they can be reviewed.

No notes yet.

Sign in to add a note.