OpenFrontiers
← Back to the index
OP-9957Status unassessedAnalysis

Voronovskaja-type Formula for the Bezier Variant of the Bernstein Operators

Voronovskaja-type Formula for the Bezier Variant of the Bernstein Operators

Specialist source · status unassessedAs of 2026-09-10Source & evidence ↓

Problem statement

voronovskaja_theorem.bezier_bernstein_operators

Conjecture: Voronovskaja-type formula for Bézier-Bernstein operators with shape parameter α>0\alpha > 0, α≠1\alpha \neq 1.

The source asks for sufficiently smooth functions. This concrete version uses ContDiffOn ℝ 2 f I as a readable baseline regularity assumption; since the domain is the compact interval [0,1][0,1], this also explains why no separate boundedness assumption is included here. The variants below record the unknown smoothness threshold more explicitly.

voronovskaja_theorem.bezier_bernstein_operators.variants.eventually_smooth

Variant of the Bézier-Bernstein Voronovskaja problem which treats "sufficiently smooth" as an eventual condition in the smoothness order mm: for all sufficiently large finite mm, every CmC^m function on [0,1][0,1] should have the asserted asymptotic formula.

voronovskaja_theorem.bezier_bernstein_operators.variants.eventually_smooth.limit_exists

Existence-only version of the eventual-smoothness variant. This separates the first part of the source problem, proving that the scaled sequence has some limit, from the stronger task of finding an explicit expression for that limit.

voronovskaja_theorem.bezier_bernstein_operators.variants.answer_smoothness

Variant of the Bézier-Bernstein Voronovskaja problem with the required smoothness order itself left as an answer. Replacing (answer(sorry) : ℕ × ((ℝ → ℝ) → ℝ → ℝ)) by a concrete value lets one state the conjecture for a chosen regularity threshold.

Lean 4

No Lean submitted

Formal statement

Lean 4
/-
Copyright 2026 The Formal Conjectures Authors.

Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the "License");
you may not use this file except in compliance with the License.
You may obtain a copy of the License at

    https://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0

Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS,
WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied.
See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
limitations under the License.
-/

import FormalConjecturesUtil

/-!
# Voronovskaja-type Formula for the Bezier Variant of the Bernstein Operators

The Bézier-type Bernstein operators $B_{n,\alpha}$ for $\alpha > 0$ are defined for
$f : [0,1] \to \mathbb{R}$ by
$$
(B_{n,\alpha} f)(x)
  = \sum_{k=0}^n f\!\left(\frac{k}{n}\right)
    \left( J_{n,k}(x)^{\alpha} - J_{n,k+1}(x)^{\alpha} \right),
$$
where
$$
J_{n,k}(x) = \sum_{j=k}^n p_{n,j}(x),
\qquad
p_{n,j}(x) = \binom{n}{j} x^j(1-x)^{n-j},
$$
and $J_{n,n+1}(x) = 0$.

In the classical case $\alpha = 1$, these operators reduce to the usual Bernstein operators.
For $f$ which are $C^2$ on $[0,1]$, one has the classical Voronovskaja
asymptotic formula
$$
\lim_{n \to \infty} n\bigl( B_{n,1} f(x) - f(x) \bigr)
    = \tfrac{1}{2} x(1-x) f''(x).
$$

## Known Results
* For $\alpha = 1$, the asymptotics are completely understood.
* Numerical experiments indicate that for $\alpha \neq 1$ the quantity
    $$
        \sqrt{n}\,\bigl( B_{n,\alpha} f(x) - f(x) \bigr)
    $$
    may converge to a non-zero limit.

## The Problem
Determine the asymptotic behaviour of the Bézier-type Bernstein operators for $\alpha > 0$,
$\alpha \neq 1$:
\textbf{Existence of the limit:}
    Prove (or disprove) the existence of the limit
    $$
        \lim_{n \to \infty}
        \sqrt{n}\,\bigl( B_{n,\alpha} f(x) - f(x) \bigr),
    $$
    at least for sufficiently smooth functions $f$.
    \textbf{Explicit form of the limit:}
    If the limit exists, determine an explicit expression for it in terms of $f$, $x$, and $\alpha$.

*References:*

* [Voronovskaja-type Formula for the Bézier Variant of the Bernstein Operators](https://www.math.bas.bg/mathmod/Proceedings_CTF/CTF-2010/files_CTF-2010/Open_problems.pdf),
  by *Ulrich Abel*, in *Constructive Theory of Functions, Sozopol 2010*.
-/
open Topology Filter Real unitInterval Polynomial
namespace VoronovskajaTypeFormula

/--
Cumulative sum $J_{n,k}(x) = \sum_{j=k}^n p_{n,j}(x)$.
-/
noncomputable def bernsteinTail (n k : ℕ) : Polynomial ℝ :=
  ∑ j ∈ Finset.Icc k n, bernsteinPolynomial ℝ n j

/--
Bézier–type Bernstein operator:
$$
(B_{n,\alpha} f)(x)
= \sum_{k=0}^{n}
f\!\left(\frac{k}{n}\right)
\left(
J_{n,k}(x)^{\alpha}
- J_{n,k+1}(x)^{\alpha}
\right)
$$
-/
noncomputable def bezierBernstein (n : ℕ) (α : ℝ) (f : ℝ → ℝ) (x : ℝ) : ℝ :=
  ∑ k ∈ Finset.range (n + 1),
    f (k / n) * ((bernsteinTail n k).eval x ^ α - (bernsteinTail n (k + 1)).eval x ^ α)

/--
Classical Voronovskaja theorem (α = 1).

For functions $f$ that are $C^2$ on $[0,1]$, the limit:
$$
n\bigl( B_n f(x) - f(x) \bigr)
\;\longrightarrow\;
\frac{1}{2}\, x(1 - x)\, f''(x)
$$
-/
@[category research solved, AMS 26 40 47]
theorem voronovskaja_theorem.bernstein_operators
    (f : ℝ → ℝ) (x : ℝ) (hx : x ∈ I)
    (hf : ContDiffOn ℝ 2 f I) :
    let f'' : ℝ := iteratedDerivWithin 2 f I x
    Tendsto (fun (n : ℕ) => (n : ℝ) * (bezierBernstein n 1 f x - f x))
    atTop
    (𝓝 ((1 / 2) * x * (1 - x) * f'')) := by
  sorry

/--
Conjecture: Voronovskaja-type formula for Bézier-Bernstein operators
with shape parameter $\alpha > 0$, $\alpha \neq 1$.

The source asks for sufficiently smooth functions. This concrete version uses
`ContDiffOn ℝ 2 f I` as a readable baseline regularity assumption; since the
domain is the compact interval $[0,1]$, this also explains why no separate
boundedness assumption is included here. The variants below record the unknown
smoothness threshold more explicitly.
-/
@[category research open, AMS 26 40 47]
theorem voronovskaja_theorem.bezier_bernstein_operators
    (α : ℝ) (hα_pos : 0 < α) (hα : α ≠ 1)
    (f : ℝ → ℝ) (x : ℝ) (hx : x ∈ I)
    (hf : ContDiffOn ℝ 2 f I) :
    Tendsto (fun n : ℕ => Real.sqrt n * (bezierBernstein n α f x - f x)) atTop
      (𝓝 answer(sorry)) := by
  sorry

/--
Variant of the Bézier-Bernstein Voronovskaja problem which treats "sufficiently smooth" as an
eventual condition in the smoothness order $m$: for all sufficiently large finite $m$, every
$C^m$ function on $[0,1]$ should have the asserted asymptotic formula.
-/
@[category research open, AMS 26 40 47]
theorem voronovskaja_theorem.bezier_bernstein_operators.variants.eventually_smooth
    (α : ℝ) (hα_pos : 0 < α) (hα : α ≠ 1) :
    let limitFormula : (ℝ → ℝ) → ℝ → ℝ := answer(sorry)
    ∀ᶠ m : ℕ in atTop,
      ∀ (f : ℝ → ℝ) (x : ℝ), x ∈ I → ContDiffOn ℝ m f I →
        Tendsto (fun n : ℕ => Real.sqrt n * (bezierBernstein n α f x - f x)) atTop
          (𝓝 (limitFormula f x)) := by
  sorry

/--
Existence-only version of the eventual-smoothness variant. This separates the first part of the
source problem, proving that the scaled sequence has some limit, from the stronger task of finding
an explicit expression for that limit.
-/
@[category research open, AMS 26 40 47]
theorem voronovskaja_theorem.bezier_bernstein_operators.variants.eventually_smooth.limit_exists
    (α : ℝ) (hα_pos : 0 < α) (hα : α ≠ 1) :
    ∀ᶠ m : ℕ in atTop,
      ∀ (f : ℝ → ℝ) (x : ℝ), x ∈ I → ContDiffOn ℝ m f I →
        ∃ L : ℝ,
          Tendsto (fun n : ℕ => Real.sqrt n * (bezierBernstein n α f x - f x)) atTop
            (𝓝 L) := by
  sorry

/--
Variant of the Bézier-Bernstein Voronovskaja problem with the required smoothness order itself
left as an answer. Replacing `(answer(sorry) : ℕ × ((ℝ → ℝ) → ℝ → ℝ))` by a concrete value lets one
state the conjecture for a chosen regularity threshold.
-/
@[category research open, AMS 26 40 47]
theorem voronovskaja_theorem.bezier_bernstein_operators.variants.answer_smoothness
    (α : ℝ) (hα_pos : 0 < α) (hα : α ≠ 1) :
    let p : ℕ × ((ℝ → ℝ) → ℝ → ℝ) := answer(sorry)
    let m := p.1
    let limitFormula := p.2
    ∀ (f : ℝ → ℝ) (x : ℝ), x ∈ I → ContDiffOn ℝ m f I →
      Tendsto (fun n : ℕ => Real.sqrt n * (bezierBernstein n α f x - f x)) atTop
        (𝓝 (limitFormula f x)) := by
  sorry

end VoronovskajaTypeFormula

On-site verification needs an executable Lean target. None is attached yet.

A source attachment or link is not a verified proof. The statement’s correspondence with the original question needs human review.

Proofs & verification

No Lean has been submitted for this problem yet. A Lean file can be attached to a submission for review, though with no target here it cannot be machine-checked.

Background

Source snapshot inspected on 10 September 2026. Subsequent research status and the accuracy of source formalizations have not been independently certified.

Fixed commit b82b08faa9006484021c12005ab41287fb2ffb69. This file contains 4 source-labeled research-open declarations. Other declarations in the attached file can be definitions, solved results or tests. The file is preserved as source material; it has not been compiled or proved by this import.

Copyright The Formal Conjectures Authors. Code: Apache-2.0; other original material: CC BY 4.0. Third-party sources retain their own licenses. Original source files and notices preserved.

References
  1. [1]Formal Conjectures — Voronovskaja-type Formula for the Bezier Variant of the Bernstein Operators link
  2. [2]Original reference cited in the formalization link

Recorded progress

Add yours →

Nothing recorded yet. A pointer to a paper the entry is missing counts.

Machine attempts

0 recorded

Attempts run against the statement below and are recorded in full, including the failures. The point is to stop the next model — and the next person — from re-walking a road that is already known to end. Each attempt costs 25 credits.

No machine attempts recorded.

Sign in to run an attempt. New accounts start with enough credits for ten.

Discussion

0 notes

Notes are for clarifying the statement, flagging a missing reference, or recording why an approach fails. Claimed solutions belong in a submission, where they can be reviewed.

No notes yet.

Sign in to add a note.