OpenFrontiers
← Back to the index
OP-9962Status unassessedNumber theory

Agrawal's conjecture

Agrawal's conjecture

Inferred from the community field; finer classification has not been reviewed.

Specialist source · status unassessedAs of 2026-09-10Source & evidence ↓

Problem statement

agrawal_conjecture

Agrawal's Primality Conjecture.

Does the congruence (X−1)n≡Xn−1(modn,Xr−1)(X-1)^n \equiv X^n - 1 \pmod{n, X^r-1} imply nn is prime (with a specific exception for n2≡1(modr)n^2 \equiv 1 \pmod{r})?

While the "if" direction is a known theorem, the "only if" direction remains a conjecture.

agrawal_conjecture.variants.popovych

Roman B. Popovych Conjecture. A stronger version of Agrawal's conjecture, which also considers the congruence (X+2)n≡Xn+2(modn,Xr−1)(X+2)^n \equiv X^n + 2 \pmod{n, X^r-1}. If both congruences hold, then nn is either prime or n2≡1(modr)n^2 \equiv 1 \pmod{r}. This variant was proposed by Roman B. Popovych in 2018.

Lean 4

No Lean submitted

Formal statement

Lean 4
/-
Copyright 2026 The Formal Conjectures Authors.

Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the "License");
you may not use this file except in compliance with the License.
You may obtain a copy of the License at

    https://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0

Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS,
WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied.
See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
limitations under the License.
-/

import FormalConjecturesUtil

/-!
# Agrawal's conjecture

Agrawal's conjecture is a stronger version of the theorem that forms the basis
of the AKS primality test. If true, it would significantly improve the
efficiency of primality testing.

The conjecture states that for coprime $n$ and $r$, if the polynomial congruence
$(X-1)^n \equiv X^n-1 \pmod{n, X^r-1}$ holds, then $n$ is either prime or $n^2 \equiv 1 \pmod{r}$.

*References:*
- [Wikipedia](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Agrawal%27s_conjecture)
- [AIM Math](https://aimath.org/WWN/primesinp/articles/html/50a/)
- [Paper](https://eprint.iacr.org/2009/008.pdf)
-/

open Polynomial

namespace AgrawalConjecture

/--
**Agrawal's Primality Conjecture.**

Does the congruence $(X-1)^n \equiv X^n - 1 \pmod{n, X^r-1}$ imply
$n$ is prime (with a specific exception for $n^2 \equiv 1 \pmod{r}$)?

While the "if" direction is a known theorem, the "only if" direction
remains a conjecture.
-/
@[category research open, AMS 11]
theorem agrawal_conjecture :
  answer(sorry) ↔
    ∀ (n r : ℕ), n > 1 → r > 0 → n.gcd r = 1 →
      let R := Polynomial (ZMod n)
      let X : R := Polynomial.X
      let I : Ideal R := Ideal.span ({X^r - 1} : Set R)
      Ideal.Quotient.mk I ((X - 1)^n) = Ideal.Quotient.mk I (X^n - 1) →
      (n.Prime ∨ (n^2 : ZMod r) = 1) := by
  sorry

/--
**Roman B. Popovych Conjecture.**
A stronger version of Agrawal's conjecture, which also considers the congruence
$(X+2)^n \equiv X^n + 2 \pmod{n, X^r-1}$.
If both congruences hold, then $n$ is either prime or $n^2 \equiv 1 \pmod{r}$.
This variant was proposed by Roman B. Popovych in 2018.
-/
@[category research open, AMS 11]
theorem agrawal_conjecture.variants.popovych :
  ∀ (n r : ℕ), n > 1 → r > 0 → n.gcd r = 1 →
    let R := Polynomial (ZMod n)
    let X : R := Polynomial.X
    let I : Ideal R := Ideal.span ({X^r - 1} : Set R)
    Ideal.Quotient.mk I ((X - 1)^n) = Ideal.Quotient.mk I (X^n - 1) →
    Ideal.Quotient.mk I ((X + 2)^n) = Ideal.Quotient.mk I (X^n + 2) →
    (n.Prime ∨ (n^2 : ZMod r) = 1) := by
  sorry

end AgrawalConjecture

On-site verification needs an executable Lean target. None is attached yet.

A source attachment or link is not a verified proof. The statement’s correspondence with the original question needs human review.

Proofs & verification

No Lean has been submitted for this problem yet. A Lean file can be attached to a submission for review, though with no target here it cannot be machine-checked.

Background

Source snapshot inspected on 10 September 2026. Subsequent research status and the accuracy of source formalizations have not been independently certified.

Fixed commit b82b08faa9006484021c12005ab41287fb2ffb69. This file contains 2 source-labeled research-open declarations. Other declarations in the attached file can be definitions, solved results or tests. The file is preserved as source material; it has not been compiled or proved by this import.

Copyright The Formal Conjectures Authors. Code: Apache-2.0; other original material: CC BY 4.0. Third-party sources retain their own licenses. Original source files and notices preserved.

References
  1. [1]Formal Conjectures — Agrawal's conjecture link
  2. [2]Original reference cited in the formalization link
  3. [3]Original reference cited in the formalization link
  4. [4]Original reference cited in the formalization link

Recorded progress

Add yours →

Nothing recorded yet. A pointer to a paper the entry is missing counts.

Machine attempts

0 recorded

Attempts run against the statement below and are recorded in full, including the failures. The point is to stop the next model — and the next person — from re-walking a road that is already known to end. Each attempt costs 25 credits.

No machine attempts recorded.

Sign in to run an attempt. New accounts start with enough credits for ten.

Discussion

0 notes

Notes are for clarifying the statement, flagging a missing reference, or recording why an approach fails. Claimed solutions belong in a submission, where they can be reviewed.

No notes yet.

Sign in to add a note.