Written on the Wall II - Conjecture 160
Written on the Wall II - Conjecture 160
Inferred from the community field; finer classification has not been reviewed.
Problem statement
conjecture160
WOWII Conjecture 160
For a simple connected graph , where:
- is the maximum number of leaves over all spanning trees of ,
- is the maximum local independence number over vertices,
- is the maximum number of triangles incident to any vertex,
- is
1if has no cycle of length four and0otherwise.
Lean 4
Formal statement
Lean 4/-
Copyright 2026 The Formal Conjectures Authors.
Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the "License");
you may not use this file except in compliance with the License.
You may obtain a copy of the License at
https://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS,
WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied.
See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
limitations under the License.
-/
import FormalConjecturesUtil
/-!
# Written on the Wall II - Conjecture 160
*Reference:*
[E. DeLaVina, Written on the Wall II, Conjectures of Graffiti.pc](http://cms.dt.uh.edu/faculty/delavinae/research/wowII/)
## Definitions
For a vertex $v$ in $G$, **$T(v)$** is the number of triangles incident to $v$:
$$T(v) = |\{\{u, w\} \subseteq N(v) \mid u \sim w\}|$$
i.e., the number of pairs of neighbors of $v$ that are themselves adjacent.
The invariant `maxTrianglesAtVertex G` is the maximum of $T(v)$ over all vertices.
Conjecture 160 uses both $\max_v T(v)$ and $\chi_{C_4}(G)$, the $C_4$-free
characteristic function: it is `1` when $G$ contains no cycle of length four
and `0` otherwise. The cycle need not be induced. These invariants lower-bound
the WOWII invariant $L_s(G)$, the maximum number of leaves over all spanning
trees of $G$ (exposed as `SimpleGraph.Ls G : ℝ`).
The earlier formalization used the number of induced four-cycles. The historical
conjecture instead uses this binary $C_4$-free indicator.
-/
namespace WrittenOnTheWallII.GraphConjecture160
open SimpleGraph
variable {α : Type*} [Fintype α] [DecidableEq α] [Nontrivial α]
/-- The maximum number of triangles incident to any vertex in $G$. -/
noncomputable def maxTrianglesAtVertex (G : SimpleGraph α) [DecidableRel G.Adj] : ℕ :=
(Finset.univ.image (numTrianglesAtVertex G)).max' (Finset.image_nonempty.mpr Finset.univ_nonempty)
open scoped Classical in
/--
WOWII [Conjecture 160](http://cms.dt.uh.edu/faculty/delavinae/research/wowII/)
For a simple connected graph $G$,
$L_s(G) \ge \max_v l(v) + \max_v T(v) \cdot \chi_{C_4}(G)$
where:
- $L_s(G) = \mathrm{SimpleGraph.Ls}\, G$ is the maximum number of leaves over all
spanning trees of $G$,
- $\max_v l(v)$ is the maximum local independence number over vertices,
- $\max_v T(v)$ is the maximum number of triangles incident to any vertex,
- $\chi_{C_4}(G)$ is `1` if $G$ has no cycle of length four and `0` otherwise.
-/
@[category research open, AMS 5]
theorem conjecture160 (G : SimpleGraph α) [DecidableRel G.Adj] (h : G.Connected) :
let maxL := (Finset.univ.image (indepNeighborsCard G)).max' (by simp)
let maxT := maxTrianglesAtVertex G
let cC4 : ℕ := if ∃ v : α, ∃ c : G.Walk v v, c.IsCycle ∧ c.length = 4 then 0 else 1
(maxL : ℝ) + (maxT : ℝ) * (cC4 : ℝ) ≤ Ls G := by
sorry
-- Sanity checks
/-- In $K_3$, every vertex has $1$ triangle incident to it. -/
@[category test, AMS 5]
example : numTrianglesAtVertex (⊤ : SimpleGraph (Fin 3)) (0 : Fin 3) = 1 := by
unfold numTrianglesAtVertex
decide +native
/-- In $K_3$, `maxTrianglesAtVertex = 1`. -/
@[category test, AMS 5]
example : maxTrianglesAtVertex (⊤ : SimpleGraph (Fin 3)) = 1 := by
unfold maxTrianglesAtVertex numTrianglesAtVertex
decide +native
/-- In the path $P_3$, vertex $1$ is adjacent to $0$ and $2$, but $0$ and $2$ are not adjacent.
So $T(1) = 0$. -/
@[category test, AMS 5]
example : numTrianglesAtVertex
(SimpleGraph.fromEdgeSet {s(0,1), s(1,2)} : SimpleGraph (Fin 3)) (1 : Fin 3) = 0 := by
unfold numTrianglesAtVertex
decide +native
end WrittenOnTheWallII.GraphConjecture160
On-site verification needs an executable Lean target. None is attached yet.
A source attachment or link is not a verified proof. The statement’s correspondence with the original question needs human review.
Proofs & verification
No Lean has been submitted for this problem yet. A Lean file can be attached to a submission for review, though with no target here it cannot be machine-checked.
Background
Source snapshot inspected on 10 September 2026. Subsequent research status and the accuracy of source formalizations have not been independently certified.
Fixed commit b82b08faa9006484021c12005ab41287fb2ffb69. This file contains 1 source-labeled research-open declarations. Other declarations in the attached file can be definitions, solved results or tests. The file is preserved as source material; it has not been compiled or proved by this import.
Copyright The Formal Conjectures Authors. Code: Apache-2.0; other original material: CC BY 4.0. Third-party sources retain their own licenses. Original source files and notices preserved.
Recorded progress
Add yours →Nothing recorded yet. A pointer to a paper the entry is missing counts.
Machine attempts
0 recordedAttempts run against the statement below and are recorded in full, including the failures. The point is to stop the next model — and the next person — from re-walking a road that is already known to end. Each attempt costs 25 credits.
No machine attempts recorded.
Sign in to run an attempt. New accounts start with enough credits for ten.
Discussion
0 notesNotes are for clarifying the statement, flagging a missing reference, or recording why an approach fails. Claimed solutions belong in a submission, where they can be reviewed.
No notes yet.
Sign in to add a note.