OpenFrontiers
← Back to the index

ON SOME MATHEMATICAL PROBLEMS OF QUANTUM FIELD THEORY · 1958-mathphys-2

Quantum Theory · ICM 1958: ON SOME MATHEMATICAL PROBLEMS OF QUANTUM FIELD THEORY

Source assessment · not reviewedAs of 2026-08-18Source & evidence ↓

Problem statement

Determine whether, after the ultraviolet divergences in each coefficient have been removed by renormalization, the perturbative expansion of each scattering-matrix element of a renormalizable quantum field theory as a formal power series in the interaction-strength parameter converges in a nonzero neighborhood of zero coupling; if it does not, prove that the perturbation series diverges.

Lean 4

Not yet attached

No Lean statement or proof is attached yet. Have a formalization? Share its source to add it to this problem.

Remaining questions in this record

Remaining questions recorded by the source

These are retained within the parent record and are not counted as additional index entries.

Question 1

Prove that the Borel transform of the order-by-order renormalized perturbation series of four-dimensional Euclidean λφ⁴ quantum field theory has renormalon singularities arising from factorial large-order growth generated by chains of renormalized subgraphs.

Source reference: Vincent Rivasseau, “Constructive Field Theory and Applications: Perspectives and Open Problems,” Journal of Mathematical Physics 41 (2000), 3764–3775, Open Problem II.1.3, DOI: 10.1063/1.533326; arXiv:math-ph/0006017, https://arxiv.org/abs/math-ph/0006017.

Progress & source assessment

Source-reported assessment from the ICM catalogue snapshot. This is not an independent review by Frontier Science.

The problem is unresolved. No citable result was found that decides ordinary convergence versus divergence for every renormalized scattering-matrix element of an arbitrary renormalizable quantum field theory. The rigorous literature instead treats particular models, observables, dimensions, or weaker notions such as asymptotic expansion and Borel summability.

  • Freeman J. Dyson, “Divergence of Perturbation Theory in Quantum Electrodynamics,” Physical Review 85 (1952), 631–632. DOI: 10.1103/PhysRev.85.631. Dyson argues that analyticity at zero electric charge would imply a physically unstable theory at negative coupling. This is the foundational evidence for divergence in QED, but it is not a rigorous proof for all renormalized QED scattering amplitudes and does not cover general renormalizable quantum field theories.
  • Jean-Pierre Eckmann, Jacques Magnen, and Roland Sénéor, “Decay Properties and Borel Summability for the Schwinger Functions in P(φ)₂ Theories,” Communications in Mathematical Physics 39 (1975), 251–271. DOI: 10.1007/BF01705374. This proves Borel summability of perturbative Schwinger functions for a class of two-dimensional constructive models. It gives rigorous nonperturbative meaning to divergent or merely asymptotic expansions in those models, but it neither proves ordinary convergence nor treats every scattering-matrix element in general renormalizable theories.
  • Jean-Pierre Eckmann and Henri Epstein, “Time-Ordered Products and Schwinger Functions,” Communications in Mathematical Physics 64 (1979), 95–130. DOI: 10.1007/BF01197509. For weakly coupled two-dimensional φ⁴ theory, the paper relates time-ordered products and Schwinger functions and proves Borel summability results including the two-particle scattering matrix. This is a direct special-case result for an S-matrix element, not a complete answer to the stated general problem.
  • Jacques Magnen and Roland Sénéor, “Phase Space Cell Expansion and Borel Summability for the Euclidean φ⁴₃ Theory,” Communications in Mathematical Physics 56 (1977), 237–276. DOI: 10.1007/BF01614211. This establishes construction and Borel summability for the three-dimensional Euclidean φ⁴ model. It is strong control of a superrenormalizable special case, but Borel summability is weaker than ordinary convergence and the result does not cover general renormalizable S-matrix elements.
  • Krzysztof Gawędzki and Antti Kupiainen, “Gross-Neveu Model Through Convergent Perturbation Expansions,” Communications in Mathematical Physics 102 (1985), 1–30. DOI: 10.1007/BF01208817. This constructs the two-dimensional Gross–Neveu model at weak coupling using convergent reorganized perturbative expansions. Such convergence in a particular fermionic model and expansion does not establish convergence of the standard renormalized S-matrix series in all theories.
  • Vincent Rivasseau, “Constructive Field Theory and Applications: Perspectives and Open Problems,” Journal of Mathematical Physics 41 (2000), 3764–3775. DOI: 10.1063/1.533326; arXiv:math-ph/0006017. The review states that nonperturbative Green functions in many low-dimensional models are Borel sums of perturbation theory, while explicitly listing the nature of the renormalized perturbation series of four-dimensional φ⁴ theory, including the existence of renormalons, as open. This records a major remaining gap even for a specific four-dimensional renormalizable model.
  • Stephen J. Summers, “A Perspective on Constructive Quantum Field Theory,” arXiv:1203.3991v2 (2016). Direct URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/1203.3991. This survey documents rigorous asymptotic, Borel-summability, and convergence results for selected low-dimensional models, while emphasizing that central four-dimensional theories such as QED, QCD, and the Standard Model still lack full mathematical constructions. Consequently, these results cannot collectively exhaust the theories and matrix elements quantified over in the statement.

Thus the strongest established progress consists of rigorous asymptotic expansions, Borel summability, or convergent reorganizations in special constructive models. What remains unresolved is the exact general question of ordinary convergence or rigorous divergence of every termwise-renormalized S-matrix perturbation series across renormalizable quantum field theory.

References
  1. [1]ICM Conjectures · 1958-mathphys-2 link
  2. [2]ICM 1958: ON SOME MATHEMATICAL PROBLEMS OF QUANTUM FIELD THEORY link

Recorded progress

Add yours →

Nothing recorded yet. A pointer to a paper the entry is missing counts.

Machine attempts

0 recorded

Attempts run against the statement below and are recorded in full, including the failures. The point is to stop the next model — and the next person — from re-walking a road that is already known to end. Each attempt costs 25 credits.

No machine attempts recorded.

Sign in to run an attempt. New accounts start with enough credits for ten.

Discussion

0 notes

Notes are for clarifying the statement, flagging a missing reference, or recording why an approach fails. Claimed solutions belong in a submission, where they can be reviewed.

No notes yet.

Sign in to add a note.