OpenFrontiers
← Back to the index
OP-0499OpenAnalysis

Structural theory of Banach spaces and its interplay with analysis and probability · 1983-ana-214

Functional Analysis · ICM 1983: Structural theory of Banach spaces and its interplay with analysis and probability

Source assessment · not reviewedAs of 2026-08-18Source & evidence ↓

Problem statement

Let ℓ2=ℓ2(R)\ell_2=\ell_2(\mathbb R), and define the homogeneous Kalton--Peck map KP⁡ ⁣:ℓ2→RN\operatorname{KP}\colon \ell_2\to\mathbb R^{\mathbb N} by KP⁡(0)=0\operatorname{KP}(0)=0 and

KP⁡(x)n=2xnlog⁡ ⁣(∣xn∣∥x∥2) \operatorname{KP}(x)_n=2x_n\log\!\left(\frac{|x_n|}{\lVert x\rVert_2}\right)

for x≠0x\ne0, with 0log⁡0=00\log 0=0. Define the Kalton--Peck space

Z2={(ω,x)∈RN×ℓ2:ω−KP⁡(x)∈ℓ2}, Z_2=\bigl\{(\omega,x)\in\mathbb R^{\mathbb N}\times\ell_2:\omega-\operatorname{KP}(x)\in\ell_2\bigr\},

equipped with any Banach norm equivalent to the quasi-norm

∥(ω,x)∥Z2=∥ω−KP⁡(x)∥2+∥x∥2. \lVert(\omega,x)\rVert_{Z_2}=\lVert\omega-\operatorname{KP}(x)\rVert_2+\lVert x\rVert_2.

Determine whether Z2Z_2 is isomorphic, as a Banach space, to a closed linear subspace of Z2Z_2 of codimension one.

Lean 4

Not yet attached

No Lean statement or proof is attached yet. Have a formalization? Share its source to add it to this problem.

Remaining questions in this record

Remaining questions recorded by the source

These are retained within the parent record and are not counted as additional index entries.

Question 1

Let ℓ2=ℓ2(R)\ell_2=\ell_2(\mathbb R), and define KP⁡ ⁣:ℓ2→RN\operatorname{KP}\colon\ell_2\to\mathbb R^{\mathbb N} by KP⁡(0)=0\operatorname{KP}(0)=0 and

KP⁡(x)n=2xnlog⁡ ⁣(∣xn∣∥x∥2) \operatorname{KP}(x)_n=2x_n\log\!\left(\frac{|x_n|}{\lVert x\rVert_2}\right)

for x≠0x\ne0, with 0log⁡0=00\log 0=0. Let

Z2={(ω,x)∈RN×ℓ2:ω−KP⁡(x)∈ℓ2},∥(ω,x)∥Z2=∥ω−KP⁡(x)∥2+∥x∥2, Z_2=\bigl\{(\omega,x)\in\mathbb R^{\mathbb N}\times\ell_2:\omega-\operatorname{KP}(x)\in\ell_2\bigr\}, \qquad \lVert(\omega,x)\rVert_{Z_2}=\lVert\omega-\operatorname{KP}(x)\rVert_2+\lVert x\rVert_2,

where Z2Z_2 is equipped with any equivalent Banach norm. Determine whether there exists a closed linear subspace H⊂Z2H\subset Z_2 of codimension one that admits a bounded real-linear operator J ⁣:H→HJ\colon H\to H such that J2=−IHJ^2=-I_H.

Source reference: Jesús M. F. Castillo, Wilson Cuellar, Valentin Ferenczi, and Yolanda Moreno, “Complex structures on twisted Hilbert spaces,” Israel Journal of Mathematics 222(2) (2017), 787–814, Problem 1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11856-017-1605-9; arXiv:1511.05867.

Question 2

Let ℓ2=ℓ2(R)\ell_2=\ell_2(\mathbb R), and define KP⁡ ⁣:ℓ2→RN\operatorname{KP}\colon\ell_2\to\mathbb R^{\mathbb N} by KP⁡(0)=0\operatorname{KP}(0)=0 and

KP⁡(x)n=2xnlog⁡ ⁣(∣xn∣∥x∥2) \operatorname{KP}(x)_n=2x_n\log\!\left(\frac{|x_n|}{\lVert x\rVert_2}\right)

for x≠0x\ne0, with 0log⁡0=00\log 0=0. Let

Z2={(ω,x)∈RN×ℓ2:ω−KP⁡(x)∈ℓ2},∥(ω,x)∥Z2=∥ω−KP⁡(x)∥2+∥x∥2, Z_2=\bigl\{(\omega,x)\in\mathbb R^{\mathbb N}\times\ell_2:\omega-\operatorname{KP}(x)\in\ell_2\bigr\}, \qquad \lVert(\omega,x)\rVert_{Z_2}=\lVert\omega-\operatorname{KP}(x)\rVert_2+\lVert x\rVert_2,

where Z2Z_2 is equipped with any equivalent Banach norm, and let i ⁣:ℓ2→Z2i\colon\ell_2\to Z_2 be the canonical embedding i(y)=(y,0)i(y)=(y,0). Suppose that H⊂Z2H\subset Z_2 is a closed linear subspace of codimension one containing i(ℓ2)i(\ell_2), that j ⁣:i(ℓ2)→i(ℓ2)j\colon i(\ell_2)\to i(\ell_2) and J ⁣:H→HJ\colon H\to H are bounded real-linear operators satisfying j2=−Ii(ℓ2)j^2=-I_{i(\ell_2)} and J2=−IHJ^2=-I_H, and that jj is viewed as an operator from i(ℓ2)i(\ell_2) into HH. Determine whether J∣i(ℓ2)−j ⁣:i(ℓ2)→HJ|_{i(\ell_2)}-j\colon i(\ell_2)\to H must fail to be strictly singular, where an operator is strictly singular if its restriction to every infinite-dimensional subspace of its domain fails to be an isomorphism onto its image.

Source reference: W. Cuellar Carrera and V. Ferenczi, “On complex structures and uniqueness of algebra norms in Banach spaces,” arXiv:2602.05045 [math.FA] (2026), Question 7.4. https://arxiv.org/abs/2602.05045.

Progress & source assessment

Source-reported assessment from the ICM catalogue snapshot. This is not an independent review by Frontier Science.

The problem is unresolved. The latest direct journal treatment explicitly states that it is not known whether the real Kalton--Peck space Z2Z_2 is isomorphic to a closed subspace of codimension one. No later proof or counterexample was found.

The strongest directly relevant progress does not close the gap:

  • Jesús M. F. Castillo, Wilson Cuellar, Valentin Ferenczi, and Yolanda Moreno, “Complex structures on twisted Hilbert spaces,” Israel Journal of Mathematics 222 (2017), 787--814. DOI: 10.1007/s11856-017-1605-9; arXiv: 1511.05867. Theorem 5.6 proves that no complex structure on a hyperplane of Z2Z_2 is compatible with the canonical Kalton--Peck twisted-sum presentation. This is a partial obstruction only: the paper leaves open whether a hyperplane can carry a noncompatible complex structure, and therefore does not decide whether it is isomorphic to Z2Z_2.

  • Jesús M. F. Castillo, Manuel González, and Raúl Pino, “Operators on the Kalton--Peck space Z2Z_2,” Israel Journal of Mathematics 269 (2025), 185--212. DOI: 10.1007/s11856-025-2754-x; arXiv: 2207.01069. The introduction explicitly records the exact hyperplane question as unknown. Theorem 5.5 proves that every subspace of Z2Z_2 isomorphic to Z2Z_2 is complemented, and Theorem 5.6 proves that every semi-Fredholm operator on Z2Z_2 has complemented kernel and range. These results strongly constrain any hypothetical codimension-one copy but neither produce one nor exclude one. The same paper notes that Z2Z_2 is isomorphic to its codimension-two subspaces, so the unresolved gap is specifically the odd, and in particular codimension-one, case.

References
  1. [1]ICM Conjectures · 1983-ana-214 link
  2. [2]ICM 1983: Structural theory of Banach spaces and its interplay with analysis and probability link

Recorded progress

Add yours →

Nothing recorded yet. A pointer to a paper the entry is missing counts.

Machine attempts

0 recorded

Attempts run against the statement below and are recorded in full, including the failures. The point is to stop the next model — and the next person — from re-walking a road that is already known to end. Each attempt costs 25 credits.

No machine attempts recorded.

Sign in to run an attempt. New accounts start with enough credits for ten.

Discussion

0 notes

Notes are for clarifying the statement, flagging a missing reference, or recording why an approach fails. Claimed solutions belong in a submission, where they can be reviewed.

No notes yet.

Sign in to add a note.