Structural theory of Banach spaces and its interplay with analysis and probability · 1983-ana-214
Functional Analysis · ICM 1983: Structural theory of Banach spaces and its interplay with analysis and probability
Problem statement
Let , and define the homogeneous Kalton--Peck map by and
for , with . Define the Kalton--Peck space
equipped with any Banach norm equivalent to the quasi-norm
Determine whether is isomorphic, as a Banach space, to a closed linear subspace of of codimension one.
Lean 4
No Lean statement or proof is attached yet. Have a formalization? Share its source to add it to this problem.
Remaining questions in this record
Remaining questions recorded by the source
These are retained within the parent record and are not counted as additional index entries.
Question 1
Let , and define by and
for , with . Let
where is equipped with any equivalent Banach norm. Determine whether there exists a closed linear subspace of codimension one that admits a bounded real-linear operator such that .
Source reference: Jesús M. F. Castillo, Wilson Cuellar, Valentin Ferenczi, and Yolanda Moreno, “Complex structures on twisted Hilbert spaces,” Israel Journal of Mathematics 222(2) (2017), 787–814, Problem 1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11856-017-1605-9; arXiv:1511.05867.
Question 2
Let , and define by and
for , with . Let
where is equipped with any equivalent Banach norm, and let be the canonical embedding . Suppose that is a closed linear subspace of codimension one containing , that and are bounded real-linear operators satisfying and , and that is viewed as an operator from into . Determine whether must fail to be strictly singular, where an operator is strictly singular if its restriction to every infinite-dimensional subspace of its domain fails to be an isomorphism onto its image.
Source reference: W. Cuellar Carrera and V. Ferenczi, “On complex structures and uniqueness of algebra norms in Banach spaces,” arXiv:2602.05045 [math.FA] (2026), Question 7.4. https://arxiv.org/abs/2602.05045.
Progress & source assessment
Source-reported assessment from the ICM catalogue snapshot. This is not an independent review by Frontier Science.
The problem is unresolved. The latest direct journal treatment explicitly states that it is not known whether the real Kalton--Peck space is isomorphic to a closed subspace of codimension one. No later proof or counterexample was found.
The strongest directly relevant progress does not close the gap:
-
Jesús M. F. Castillo, Wilson Cuellar, Valentin Ferenczi, and Yolanda Moreno, “Complex structures on twisted Hilbert spaces,” Israel Journal of Mathematics 222 (2017), 787--814. DOI: 10.1007/s11856-017-1605-9; arXiv: 1511.05867. Theorem 5.6 proves that no complex structure on a hyperplane of is compatible with the canonical Kalton--Peck twisted-sum presentation. This is a partial obstruction only: the paper leaves open whether a hyperplane can carry a noncompatible complex structure, and therefore does not decide whether it is isomorphic to .
-
Jesús M. F. Castillo, Manuel González, and Raúl Pino, “Operators on the Kalton--Peck space ,” Israel Journal of Mathematics 269 (2025), 185--212. DOI: 10.1007/s11856-025-2754-x; arXiv: 2207.01069. The introduction explicitly records the exact hyperplane question as unknown. Theorem 5.5 proves that every subspace of isomorphic to is complemented, and Theorem 5.6 proves that every semi-Fredholm operator on has complemented kernel and range. These results strongly constrain any hypothetical codimension-one copy but neither produce one nor exclude one. The same paper notes that is isomorphic to its codimension-two subspaces, so the unresolved gap is specifically the odd, and in particular codimension-one, case.
Recorded progress
Add yours →Nothing recorded yet. A pointer to a paper the entry is missing counts.
Machine attempts
0 recordedAttempts run against the statement below and are recorded in full, including the failures. The point is to stop the next model — and the next person — from re-walking a road that is already known to end. Each attempt costs 25 credits.
No machine attempts recorded.
Sign in to run an attempt. New accounts start with enough credits for ten.
Discussion
0 notesNotes are for clarifying the statement, flagging a missing reference, or recording why an approach fails. Claimed solutions belong in a submission, where they can be reviewed.
No notes yet.
Sign in to add a note.