A Nonparametric Framework for Statistical Modelling · 1986-stat-4
Nonparametric Inference · ICM 1986: A Nonparametric Framework for Statistical Modelling
Inferred from the community field; finer classification has not been reviewed.
Problem statement
Let be compact, and let be a continuous, strictly positive probability density on . Set . For each , let be a -dimensional linear space of functions on with basis , where on and no nonzero linear combination of the basis functions vanishes almost everywhere. Assume that , for some , every continuous function on can be approximated uniformly by elements of , and there is a constant such that, for every :
- the -orthogonal projection onto satisfies for every ;
- on for ;
- each is supported in a set of diameter at most , and each intersects at most of the sets ;
- for every and every ,
For define
Let , let be the unique maximizer over of
and put . Given independent observations with density , let maximize
over , and put . Define probability measures
and set
For a class of measurable subsets of , write
Determine explicit additional regularity conditions on , , and under which one can prove that
and, for every fixed with ,
Lean 4
No Lean statement or proof is attached yet. Have a formalization? Share its source to add it to this problem.
Remaining questions in this record
Remaining questions recorded by the source
These are retained within the parent record and are not counted as additional index entries.
Question 1
Let be a compact interval, let be independent observations from a density that is continuous and strictly positive on , and let be a univariate log-spline space of dimension generated by a quasi-uniform B-spline basis. For , define
Let maximize the expected log likelihood over the identifiable parameter subspace, let , and let be the maximum-likelihood log-spline estimate. Write , , and for the distribution functions of , , and , respectively, and let . If
prove or disprove that
Source reference: Charles J. Stone, “Large-Sample Inference for Log-Spline Models,” The Annals of Statistics, vol. 18, no. 2, 1990, conjecture stated in the informal summary preceding the quantile-function discussion, DOI: 10.1214/aos/1176347622.
Progress & source assessment
Source-reported assessment from the ICM catalogue snapshot. This is not an independent review by Frontier Science.
unresolved
The exact problem is not completely resolved in the literature. Stone’s 1986 proceedings paper introduces the loglinear density model, defines the approximation error , and asks for a corresponding result beyond the special one-dimensional case; it does not specify sufficient general conditions on an arbitrary class , the spaces , and the density that establish both conclusions in the statement.
The main directly relevant partial result is:
Charles J. Stone, “Large-Sample Inference for Log-Spline Models,” The Annals of Statistics 18 (1990), no. 2, DOI: 10.1214/aos/1176347622. For one-dimensional compact intervals with a univariate log-spline model, Stone proves the distribution-function approximation bounds and , and proves pointwise asymptotic normality for with its asymptotic standard deviation, uniformly over compact subsets of the interior. Here is the spline dimension, is the true distribution function, is the expected-log-likelihood projection, and is the fitted logspline distribution function. These results cover a special one-dimensional spline/distribution-function setting, not the original arbitrary-dimensional class-of-sets problem.
The same paper explicitly conjectures, in that one-dimensional setting, that if , where is the empirical distribution function. The conjecture is a narrower open component related to the original question; the literature search found no citable proof or counterexample resolving it through July 31, 2026.
The original source is Charles J. Stone, “A Nonparametric Framework for Statistical Modelling,” in Proceedings of the International Congress of Mathematicians, Berkeley, California, 1986, American Mathematical Society, 1987, pp. 188–202. It states the target bounds under unspecified “reasonable conditions” and notes only the special case proved in Stone’s 1986 Berkeley technical report, “Asymptotic Properties of Logspline Density Estimation,” Technical Report No. 69, Department of Statistics, University of California, Berkeley.
Thus the literature establishes important special-case approximation and pointwise-inference results, but it does not provide a complete answer covering the exact general statement’s arbitrary , arbitrary admissible , and general localized spaces .
Recorded progress
Add yours →Nothing recorded yet. A pointer to a paper the entry is missing counts.
Machine attempts
0 recordedAttempts run against the statement below and are recorded in full, including the failures. The point is to stop the next model — and the next person — from re-walking a road that is already known to end. Each attempt costs 25 credits.
No machine attempts recorded.
Sign in to run an attempt. New accounts start with enough credits for ten.
Discussion
0 notesNotes are for clarifying the statement, flagging a missing reference, or recording why an approach fails. Claimed solutions belong in a submission, where they can be reviewed.
No notes yet.
Sign in to add a note.