OpenFrontiers
← Back to the index
OP-12045OpenOptimization

Gradient Descent Exponent (C35C_{35})

Gradient Descent Exponent: determine C35C_{35} or improve its bounds; the repository records log⁡2(1+2)≈1.271\log_2(1+\sqrt{2}) \approx 1.271 (lower) and 2 (upper).

Editorial MSC2020 classification. Original article codes and source evidence are recorded in the literature directory.

Licensed source statementAs of Repository table at commit 2c1968c (2026-09-26); open while the recorded lower and upper bounds differSource & evidence ↓

Problem statement

Let ff be a convex function with 11-Lipschitz gradient. We assume black-box access to the function and its gradient. Gradient descent will converge to a global minimum with an appropriate choice of step size ss: xk+1:=xk−s⋅∇f(xk)x_{k+1} := x_k - s\cdot \nabla f(x_k). In general, ss can be chosen to vary with the step kk. The function gap f(xk)−inf⁡ff(x_k) - \inf f, will then converge like O(k−c)O(k^{-c}) for some exponent cc where kk is the iteration counter. While fixed step sizes achieve c=1c=1, time-varying patterns of increasing and decreasing step sizes can lead to improved rates of convergence, increasing the exponent.

The constant C35C_{35} is the largest exponent cc such that there exists a step schedule s:N→Rs : \mathbb{N} \to \mathbb{R} so that vanilla gradient descent has a worst-case convergence of O(k−c)O(k^{-c}).

Lean 4

Not yet attached

No Lean statement or proof is attached yet. Have a formalization? Share its source to add it to this problem.

Background

References (from the repository page)

  • [AP24] Jason M Altschuler and Pablo A Parrilo. Acceleration by stepsize hedging: Silver stepsize schedule for smooth convex optimization. Mathematical Programming, pages 1–14, 2024.
  • [B2015] Dimitri P. Bertsekas. Convex optimization algorithms. 2015.
  • [GSW23] Benjamin Grimmer, Kevin Shu, and Alex L. Wang. Accelerated Gradient Descent via Long Steps. arXiv:2309.09961
  • [N2014] Yurii Nesterov. Introductory Lectures on Convex Optimization: A Basic Course. Springer Publishing Company, Incorporated, 1 edition, 2014.

Progress & source assessment

Repository table (commit 2c1968c, 26 September 2026): best known lower bound log⁡2(1+2)≈1.271\log_2(1+\sqrt{2}) \approx 1.271; best known upper bound 2. Values marked with an asterisk have minimal verification.

Known upper bounds

Bound Reference Comments
2 Folklore See, e.g., [N2014]

Known lower bounds

Bound Reference Comments
1 Folklore Achieved by constant step sizes. See, e.g., [B2015].
1.0564 [GSW23] Obtained by nonconstant, nonperiodic stepsize schedule. Appeared on arXiv concurrently with [AP24]
log⁡2(1+2)≈1.271\log_2(1+\sqrt{2}) \approx 1.271 [AP24] Obtained by the "silver stepsize schedule". Conjecturally optimal. Appeared on arXiv concurrently with [GSW23].
References
  1. [1]Davis, Damek; Ivanisvili, Paata; Tao, Terence (maintainers). Optimization Constants in Mathematics, github.com/teorth/optimizationproblems (commit 2c1968c, 26 September 2026). — Gradient Descent Exponent ($C_{35}$) linkApache-2.0 (repository license); constant pages reproduced with attribution; repository references retained.

Recorded progress

Add yours →

Nothing recorded yet. A pointer to a paper the entry is missing counts.

Machine attempts

0 recorded

Attempts run against the statement below and are recorded in full, including the failures. The point is to stop the next model — and the next person — from re-walking a road that is already known to end. Each attempt costs 25 credits.

No machine attempts recorded.

Sign in to run an attempt. New accounts start with enough credits for ten.

Discussion

0 notes

Notes are for clarifying the statement, flagging a missing reference, or recording why an approach fails. Claimed solutions belong in a submission, where they can be reviewed.

No notes yet.

Sign in to add a note.