Sphere packing density in ()
Sphere packing density in : determine or improve its bounds; the repository records (lower) and 0.644421 (upper).
Editorial MSC2020 classification. Original article codes and source evidence are recorded in the literature directory.
Problem statement
is the (optimal) sphere packing density in , i.e. the largest fraction of that can be covered by congruent balls with disjoint interiors. [CE2003-pack-problem] [CE2003-def-density] [CE2003-greatest-density]
More precisely, for a packing in , let denote the union of all balls in the packing, and let denote a (Euclidean) ball of radius centered at . The (upper) density of is
Then the sphere packing density in is
the greatest packing density in .
It is often convenient to work with the center density , defined (for packings of unit spheres) by
where is a unit ball in . [dLOV2014-center-density]
Lean 4
No Lean statement or proof is attached yet. Have a formalization? Share its source to add it to this problem.
Background
References (from the repository page)
-
[CE2003] Cohn, Henry; Elkies, Noam. New upper bounds on sphere packings I. Annals of Mathematics 157 (2003), 689–714. DOI: 10.4007/annals.2003.157.689. arXiv PDF: https://arxiv.org/pdf/math/0110009.pdf. Google Scholar.
-
[CE2003-pack-problem] loc: arXiv PDF p.1, Introduction (opening paragraph). quote: “The sphere packing problem asks for the densest packing of spheres into Euclidean space. More precisely, what fraction of can be covered by congruent balls that do not intersect except along their boundaries?”
-
[CE2003-def-density] loc: arXiv PDF p.3, Introduction (density definition). quote: “The density of a packing is defined to be the fraction of space covered by the balls in the packing.”
-
[CE2003-greatest-density] loc: arXiv PDF p.3, Introduction (greatest packing density). quote: “One can prove that periodic packings come arbitrarily close to the greatest packing density.”
-
[CE2003-upper-density] loc: arXiv PDF p.20, Appendix A (upper density definition). quote: “every packing has an upper density, defined by .”
-
[CE2003-appC-table3-d4-row] loc: arXiv PDF p.23, Appendix C (Table 3, row “4”). quote: “.”
-
[dLOV2014] de Laat, David; de Oliveira Filho, Fernando Mário; Vallentin, Frank. Upper bounds for packings of spheres of several radii. Forum of Mathematics, Sigma 2 (2014). DOI: 10.1017/fms.2014.24. arXiv PDF. Google Scholar.
-
[dLOV2014-center-density] loc: Journal PDF p.13, Section 1.4 (paragraph before Table 1). quote: “the center density of a packing of unit spheres being equal to , where is the density of the packing, and is a unit ball.”
-
[dLOV2014-table1-d4-row] loc: Journal PDF p.14, Table 1, row “4”. quote: “.”
Progress & source assessment
Repository table (commit 2c1968c, 26 September 2026): best known lower bound ; best known upper bound 0.644421. Values marked with an asterisk have minimal verification.
Known upper bounds
| Bound | Reference | Comments |
|---|---|---|
| Trivial | A packing cannot cover more than all of . | |
| CE2003 | CE2003 lists the dimension- Rogers bound on center density (Appendix C, Table 3). Converting gives . [CE2003-appC-table3-d4-row] [dLOV2014-center-density] | |
| CE2003 | CE2003 lists the dimension- “New Upper Bound” on center density (Appendix C, Table 3). Converting gives . [CE2003-appC-table3-d4-row] [dLOV2014-center-density] | |
| dLOV2014 | dLOV2014 lists the dimension- center density upper bound (Table 1). Converting via gives . [dLOV2014-table1-d4-row] [dLOV2014-center-density] |
Known lower bounds
| Bound | Reference | Comments |
|---|---|---|
| Trivial | Since densities are nonnegative. | |
| dLOV2014 | dLOV2014 lists the dimension- center density lower bound (Table 1). Converting via gives . [dLOV2014-table1-d4-row] [dLOV2014-center-density] |
- [1]Davis, Damek; Ivanisvili, Paata; Tao, Terence (maintainers). Optimization Constants in Mathematics, github.com/teorth/optimizationproblems (commit 2c1968c, 26 September 2026). — Sphere packing density in $\mathbb{R}^4$ ($C_{36}$) linkApache-2.0 (repository license); constant pages reproduced with attribution; repository references retained.
Recorded progress
Add yours →Nothing recorded yet. A pointer to a paper the entry is missing counts.
Machine attempts
0 recordedAttempts run against the statement below and are recorded in full, including the failures. The point is to stop the next model — and the next person — from re-walking a road that is already known to end. Each attempt costs 25 credits.
No machine attempts recorded.
Sign in to run an attempt. New accounts start with enough credits for ten.
Discussion
0 notesNotes are for clarifying the statement, flagging a missing reference, or recording why an approach fails. Claimed solutions belong in a submission, where they can be reviewed.
No notes yet.
Sign in to add a note.