The degree--sensitivity exponent ()
The degree--sensitivity exponent: determine or improve its bounds; the repository records (lower) and 2 (upper).
Editorial MSC2020 classification. Original article codes and source evidence are recorded in the literature directory.
Problem statement
Let be a Boolean function on bits, i.e.
with . For {0,1}^n and , let be with the -th bit flipped.
The (pointwise) sensitivity of at is
and the (max) sensitivity is
Let be the degree of the unique multilinear polynomial over that agrees with on {0,1}^n.
Define the degree--sensitivity exponent
where the supremum ranges over all and all Boolean functions on {0,1}^n with .
Equivalently, is the supremum over exponents such that there exists a Boolean function of degree at least 2 with
Lean 4
No Lean statement or proof is attached yet. Have a formalization? Share its source to add it to this problem.
Background
-
The best known explicit exponent separating sensitivity from degree is currently (the “Kushilevitz barrier”). Improving this exponent is an open problem. “Kushilevitz function” was introduced (unpublished by Kushilevitz) in Footnote 1 of Nisan and Wigderson’s paper [NW95].
-
(Kushilevitz function.) One explicit polynomial representing the Kushilevitz function
is
which is Boolean on {0,1}^6, has degree , and max sensitivity achieved at .
- Before Kushilevitz’s 6-variable function (giving exponent ), a simpler 3-variable function already yields exponent . One concrete choice is the "not-all-equal" function on 3 bits,
which is Boolean on the cube, has , and at .
- For background on the general relationship between sensitivity, block sensitivity, and degree (including Huang’s proof of the Sensitivity Conjecture), see [H2019] and the surveys [BdW2002], [HKP2011].
References (from the repository page)
- [BdW2002] Buhrman, H.; de Wolf, R. Complexity Measures and Decision Tree Complexity: A Survey. Theoretical Computer Science 288 (2002), 21–43. doi:10.1016/S0304-3975(01)00144-X.
- [H2019] Huang, H. Induced Subgraphs of Hypercubes and a Proof of the Sensitivity Conjecture. Annals of Mathematics 190 (2019), 949–955. doi:10.4007/annals.2019.190.3.6.
- [HKP2011] Hatami, P.; Kulkarni, R.; Pankratov, D. Variations on the Sensitivity Conjecture. Theory of Computing Library, Graduate Surveys 4 (2011). See Example 5.4 for Kushilevitz’s function and its powering. https://theoryofcomputing.org/articles/gs004/gs004.pdf
- [NS1994] Nisan, N.; Szegedy, M. On the Degree of Boolean Functions as Real Polynomials. Computational Complexity 4 (1994), 301–313. doi:10.1007/BF01263419.
- [NW95] Nisan, Noam; Wigderson, Avi. On rank vs. communication complexity. Combinatorica 15 (1995), no. 4, 557–565. Contains Footnote 1 describing Kushilevitz’s function. :contentReference[oaicite:2]{index=2}
- [P2021] Proskurin, N. V. On Separation between the Degree of a Boolean Function and the Block Sensitivity. arXiv:2101.08600 (2021). https://arxiv.org/abs/2101.08600
- [T2013] Tal, A. Properties and Applications of Boolean Function Composition. ITCS 2013, 441–454. doi:10.1145/2422436.2422485.
Progress & source assessment
Repository table (commit 2c1968c, 26 September 2026): best known lower bound ; best known upper bound 2. Values marked with an asterisk have minimal verification.
Known upper bounds
| Bound | Reference | Comments |
|---|---|---|
| [NS1994], [T2013] | One has and , giving an exponent upper bound . | |
| [P2021] | Improves the constant factor in the quadratic bound: , hence (still exponent ). |
Known lower bounds
| Bound | Reference | Comments |
|---|---|---|
| Trivial | Parity on bits has and . | |
| [BdW2002], [T2013] | Earlier explicit separation (pre-Kushilevitz) | |
| [HKP2011] | Kushilevitz function on bits has and , and hence exponent . |
- [1]Davis, Damek; Ivanisvili, Paata; Tao, Terence (maintainers). Optimization Constants in Mathematics, github.com/teorth/optimizationproblems (commit 2c1968c, 26 September 2026). — The degree--sensitivity exponent ($C_{37}$) linkApache-2.0 (repository license); constant pages reproduced with attribution; repository references retained.
Recorded progress
Add yours →Nothing recorded yet. A pointer to a paper the entry is missing counts.
Machine attempts
0 recordedAttempts run against the statement below and are recorded in full, including the failures. The point is to stop the next model — and the next person — from re-walking a road that is already known to end. Each attempt costs 25 credits.
No machine attempts recorded.
Sign in to run an attempt. New accounts start with enough credits for ten.
Discussion
0 notesNotes are for clarifying the statement, flagging a missing reference, or recording why an approach fails. Claimed solutions belong in a submission, where they can be reviewed.
No notes yet.
Sign in to add a note.