OpenFrontiers
← Back to the index
OP-11998OpenCombinatorics

Unnormalized single-set sum-difference exponent (C3eC_{3e})

Unnormalized single-set sum-difference exponent: determine C3eC_{3e} or improve its bounds; the repository records 1.27155 (lower) and 1.33333 (upper).

Editorial MSC2020 classification. Original article codes and source evidence are recorded in the literature directory.

Licensed source statementAs of Repository table at commit 2c1968c (2026-09-26); open while the recorded lower and upper bounds differSource & evidence ↓

Problem statement

For a finite non-empty set AA of integers, C3eC_{3e} is the least constant such that

∣A−A∣≤∣A+A∣C3e|A - A| \le |A + A|^{C_{3e}}

for every such AA; equivalently, C3e=sup⁡Alog⁡∣A−A∣/log⁡∣A+A∣C_{3e} = \sup_A \log\lvert A-A\rvert / \log\lvert A+A\rvert. This is Problem 6.43 of [GGSWT2025].

It measures how much larger the difference set can be than the sumset, without normalizing by ∣A∣\lvert A\rvert — which is what distinguishes it from C3dC_{3d}, the least θ\theta with ∣A+A∣/∣A∣≤(∣A−A∣/∣A∣)θ\lvert A+A\rvert/\lvert A\rvert \le (\lvert A-A\rvert/\lvert A\rvert)^{\theta}. The two normalizations have different classical bounds and different records, and conflating them has caused published confusion; see the caution below.

Lean 4

Not yet attached

No Lean statement or proof is attached yet. Have a formalization? Share its source to add it to this problem.

Background

  • Where the log⁡(1+2)/log⁡2\log(1+\sqrt{2})/\log 2 comes from. For A=V(m,m/2):={x∈Nm:x1+⋯+xm≤m/2}A = V(m, m/2) := \{x \in \mathbb{N}^m : x_1 + \dots + x_m \le m/2\}, [GHR2007, §2 Remark] records the asymptotics
log⁡∣2A∣=(2log⁡2+o(1))m,log⁡∣A−A∣=(2log⁡(1+2)+o(1))m\log |2A| = (2\log 2 + o(1))m, \qquad \log |A - A| = (2\log(1+\sqrt{2}) + o(1))m

as m→∞m \to \infty, whence log⁡∣A−A∣/log⁡∣A+A∣→log⁡(1+2)/log⁡2=1.27155…\log\lvert A-A\rvert / \log\lvert A+A\rvert \to \log(1+\sqrt{2})/\log 2 = 1.27155\dots. The cardinalities themselves are given by

∣V∣=(m+Lm),∣2V∣=(m+2Lm),∣V−V∣=∑k=0min⁡(m,L)(mk)2(L+m−km)|V| = \binom{m+L}{m}, \qquad |2V| = \binom{m+2L}{m}, \qquad |V - V| = \sum_{k=0}^{\min(m,L)} \binom{m}{k}^2 \binom{L+m-k}{m}

with L=m/2L = m/2 [GHR2007, (14)], following [HRY1999].

  • Caution: two normalizations, two constants. [PeWe13, §4] track both
f(A)=log⁡∣A+A∣log⁡∣A−A∣andg(A)=log⁡(∣A+A∣/∣A∣)log⁡(∣A−A∣/∣A∣),f(A) = \frac{\log \lvert A+A\rvert}{\log \lvert A-A\rvert} \qquad\text{and}\qquad g(A) = \frac{\log(\lvert A+A\rvert/\lvert A\rvert)}{\log(\lvert A-A\rvert/\lvert A\rvert)},

with classical bounds 3/4≤f≤4/33/4 \le f \le 4/3 and 1/2≤g≤21/2 \le g \le 2. The constant on this page is sup⁡A1/f(A)\sup_A 1/f(A); C3dC_{3d} is sup⁡Ag(A)\sup_A g(A); and the Penman–Wells records sup⁡Af(A)≃1.030597781\sup_A f(A) \simeq 1.030597781 and sup⁡Ag(A)≃1.125944426\sup_A g(A) \simeq 1.125944426 are two further, distinct quantities. Quoting an ff-value as though it were a gg-value is a mistake that has reached print; see the corresponding note on the C3dC_{3d} page.

  • The reverse direction. The companion constant, the least CC with ∣A+A∣≤∣A−A∣C\lvert A+A\rvert \le \lvert A-A\rvert^{C}, is sup⁡Af(A)\sup_A f(A). It also satisfies ≤4/3\le 4/3 by [FrPi73], and the best construction known is the Penman–Wells family with f(Q10)≃1.030597781f(Q_{10}) \simeq 1.030597781 [PeWe13, Theorem 20]. It is not separately recorded in this repository.

  • Relation to the other constants in this family. C3aC_{3a} is the two-set Gyarmati–Hennecart–Ruzsa exponent, under the constraint ∣A+B∣≪∣A∣\lvert A+B\rvert \ll \lvert A\rvert; note that its 4/34/3 upper bound comes from the same circle of Plünnecke–Ruzsa estimates. C3bC_{3b} and C3cC_{3c} are the Katz–Tao arithmetic-Kakeya sum-difference constants. In the numbering of [GGSWT2025] these are Problems 6.42 (C3dC_{3d}), 6.43 (this page), 6.44 (C3aC_{3a}) and 6.30 (C3bC_{3b}, C3cC_{3c}).

  • AlphaEvolve repository page for this problem

References (from the repository page)

  • [FrPi73] Freiman, G. A.; Pigaev, V. P. The relation between the invariants RR and TT (Russian). Kalinin. Gos. Univ., Moscow, 1973, pp. 172–174.
  • [Ru96] Ruzsa, I. Z. Sums of finite sets. In: Number Theory: New York Seminar (D. V. Chudnovsky, G. V. Chudnovsky, M. B. Nathanson, eds.), Springer-Verlag, 1996, pp. 281–293.
  • [HRY1999] Hennecart, F.; Robert, G.; Yudin, A. On the number of sums and differences. In: Structure Theory of Set Addition, Astérisque 258 (1999), 173–178.
  • [GHR2007] Gyarmati, Katalin; Hennecart, François; Ruzsa, Imre Z. Sums and differences of finite sets. Functiones et Approximatio Commentarii Mathematici 37(1) (2007), 175–186.
  • [PeWe13] Penman, D.; Wells, M. On sets with more restricted sums than differences. Integers 13 (2013), #A57.
  • [GGSWT2025] Georgiev, Bogdan; Gómez-Serrano, Javier; Tao, Terence; Wagner, Adam Zsolt. Mathematical exploration and discovery at scale. arXiv:2511.02864. This constant is Problem 6.43, in §6.25.

Progress & source assessment

Repository table (commit 2c1968c, 26 September 2026): best known lower bound 1.27155; best known upper bound 1.33333. Values marked with an asterisk have minimal verification.

Known upper bounds

Bound Reference Comments
32\frac{3}{2} Elementary Ruzsa's triangle inequality with X=Y=Z=AX = Y = Z = A gives ∣A−A∣≤∣A+A∣2/∣A∣\lvert A-A\rvert \le \lvert A+A\rvert^2/\lvert A\rvert, and ∣A+A∣≤∣A∣2\lvert A+A\rvert \le \lvert A\rvert^2 gives ∣A∣≥∣A+A∣1/2\lvert A\rvert \ge \lvert A+A\rvert^{1/2}; combining yields ∣A−A∣≤∣A+A∣3/2\lvert A-A\rvert \le \lvert A+A\rvert^{3/2}.
43=1.3333…\frac{4}{3} = 1.3333\dots [FrPi73] The classical Freiman–Pigaev inequality ∣A+A∣3/4≤∣A−A∣≤∣A+A∣4/3\lvert A+A\rvert^{3/4} \le \lvert A-A\rvert \le \lvert A+A\rvert^{4/3}. Quoted in this form by [GGSWT2025, Problem 6.43] and by [PeWe13, §4].

Known lower bounds

Bound Reference Comments
11 Trivial Any arithmetic progression has ∣A+A∣=∣A−A∣=2∣A∣−1\lvert A+A\rvert = \lvert A-A\rvert = 2\lvert A\rvert - 1.
log⁡(1+2)log⁡2=1.2715…\frac{\log(1+\sqrt{2})}{\log 2} = 1.2715\dots [HRY1999] The high-dimensional simplex A={(x1,…,xN)∈Z+N:x1+⋯+xN≤N/2}A = \{(x_1,\dots,x_N) \in \mathbb{Z}_{+}^{N} : x_1 + \dots + x_N \le N/2\}, projected to Z\mathbb{Z}. See the note below for the asymptotics that produce this value.
≈1.21\approx 1.21 [GGSWT2025] AlphaEvolve, given no human hints, did not recover the simplex construction within a few hours and reached only about 1.211.21 — one of the cases [GGSWT2025] records as not matching the literature. Inferior to [HRY1999].
References
  1. [1]Davis, Damek; Ivanisvili, Paata; Tao, Terence (maintainers). Optimization Constants in Mathematics, github.com/teorth/optimizationproblems (commit 2c1968c, 26 September 2026). — Unnormalized single-set sum-difference exponent ($C_{3e}$) linkApache-2.0 (repository license); constant pages reproduced with attribution; repository references retained.

Recorded progress

Add yours →

Nothing recorded yet. A pointer to a paper the entry is missing counts.

Machine attempts

0 recorded

Attempts run against the statement below and are recorded in full, including the failures. The point is to stop the next model — and the next person — from re-walking a road that is already known to end. Each attempt costs 25 credits.

No machine attempts recorded.

Sign in to run an attempt. New accounts start with enough credits for ten.

Discussion

0 notes

Notes are for clarifying the statement, flagging a missing reference, or recording why an approach fails. Claimed solutions belong in a submission, where they can be reviewed.

No notes yet.

Sign in to add a note.