OpenFrontiers
← Back to the index
OP-12059OpenAnalysis

Centered Hardy-Littlewood maximal constant in dimension 22 (C47C_{47})

Centered Hardy-Littlewood maximal constant in dimension 22: determine C47C_{47} or improve its bounds; the repository records 1.68550999 (lower) and 3.879 (upper).

Editorial MSC2020 classification. Original article codes and source evidence are recorded in the literature directory.

Licensed source statementAs of Repository table at commit 2c1968c (2026-09-26); open while the recorded lower and upper bounds differSource & evidence ↓

Problem statement

In Rd\mathbb{R}^d (d≥1d\ge 1), let MdM_d denote the centered Hardy–Littlewood maximal operator associated to cubes, defined by

Mdf(x) := sup⁡r>0 1∣Q(x,r)∣∫Q(x,r)∣f(y)∣ dy,M_d f(x)\ :=\ \sup_{r>0}\ \frac{1}{\lvert Q(x,r)\rvert}\int_{Q(x,r)} \lvert f(y)\rvert\,dy,

where Q(x,r)Q(x,r) is a closed ℓ∞\ell_\infty ball of radius rr and center xx in Rd\mathbb{R}^d, that is, a closed cube centered at xx, with sides parallel to the coordinate axes, and sidelength 2r2r, and ∣⋅∣\lvert\cdot\rvert denotes Lebesgue measure. [Ald2011-def-Md] [Ald2011-def-Qxr]

Let cdc_d be the smallest constant such that for every f∈L1(Rd)f\in L^1(\mathbb{R}^d) and every α>0\alpha>0,

α ∣{x∈Rd: Mdf(x)≥α}∣ ≤ cd ∥f∥1.\alpha\,\bigl\lvert\{x\in\mathbb{R}^d:\ M_d f(x)\ge \alpha\}\bigr\rvert\ \le\ c_d\,\lVert f\rVert_1.

[Ald2011-def-cd]

We define

C47 := c2,C_{47}\ :=\ c_2,

the optimal weak-type (1,1)(1,1) constant of the centered Hardy–Littlewood maximal operator associated to axis-parallel squares in R2\mathbb{R}^2.

Lean 4

Not yet attached

No Lean statement or proof is attached yet. Have a formalization? Share its source to add it to this problem.

Background

  • Reading the tables. Rows are in chronological order, not in order of strength, so the last row is not always the record. The current records are the Φ≈1.6855099933\Phi\approx 1.6855099933 lower bound and the 3.8793.879 upper bound, both [Lin2026]; among the earlier lower bounds, [Ald2000]'s ≈1.6211915\approx 1.6211915 is stronger than the [Mel2003] row that follows it.

  • Status. The exact value of c2c_2 is unknown; in fact, no best constants cdc_d are known for d>1d>1. [Ald2011-open-d-gt-1]

  • Dimension growth for cubes. For cube averages, the optimal weak-type constants satisfy cd→∞c_d\to\infty as d→∞d\to\infty. [Ald2011-cd-infty]

  • Discretization (Dirac deltas). For cubes, studying sums of Dirac deltas suffices for upper bounds and growth questions; moreover discretization does not change the best constants. [Ald2011-discretization]

  • Wikipedia page on the Hardy–Littlewood maximal function

References (from the repository page)

  • [Ald2000] Aldaz, José M. A remark on the centered nn-dimensional Hardy-Littlewood maximal function. Czechoslovak Mathematical Journal 50 (2000), no. 1, 103-112. MR 1745465. DML-CZ. PDF.

  • [Ald2000-prop1.4] loc: p. 110, Proposition 1.4. note: Specializing Aldaz's formula to n=2n=2 gives 34−24+62\dfrac{3}{4}-\dfrac{\sqrt{2}}{4}+\dfrac{\sqrt{6}}{2}.

  • [Ald2011] Aldaz, José M. The weak type (1,1) bounds for the maximal function associated to cubes grow to infinity with the dimension. Annals of Mathematics (2) 173 (2011), no. 2, 1013–1023. DOI: 10.4007/annals.2011.173.2.10. Google Scholar. arXiv PDF

  • [Ald2011-cd-infty] loc: arXiv PDF p.1, Abstract. quote: “We show that cd→∞c_d \to \infty as d→∞d \to \infty.”

  • [Ald2011-def-Md] loc: arXiv PDF p.1, Introduction (definition of MdM_d). quote: “(1) Mdf(x):=sup⁡r>01∣Q(x,r)∣∫Q(x,r)∣f(y)∣ dyM_d f(x):=\sup_{r>0}\frac{1}{|Q(x,r)|}\int_{Q(x,r)}|f(y)|\,dy.”

  • [Ald2011-def-Qxr] loc: arXiv PDF p.1, Introduction (definition of Q(x,r)Q(x,r)). quote: “By a cube Q(x,r)Q(x,r) we mean a closed ℓ∞\ell_\infty ball of radius rr and center xx in Rd\mathbb{R}^d, that is, a closed cube centered at xx, with sides parallel to the coordinate axes, and sidelength 2r2r.”

  • [Ald2011-def-cd] loc: arXiv PDF p.1, Introduction (definition of cdc_d). quote: “Denote by cdc_d the best (i.e. lowest) constant satisfying (2) in Rd\mathbb{R}^d.”

  • [Ald2011-monotone] loc: arXiv PDF p.1, Introduction. quote: “In fact, these constants approach ∞\infty in a monotone manner, since cd+1≥cdc_{d+1}\ge c_d by [AV, Theorem 2].”

  • [Ald2011-discretization] loc: arXiv PDF p.2, Introduction. quote: “We mention for completeness that considering Dirac deltas also suffices to give upper bounds, as shown by M. de Guzmán, see [Gu, Theorem 4.1.1]. Furthermore, M. Trinidad Menárguez and F. Soria proved that discretizing does not alter constants, cf. [MS, Theorem 1], so it can be used to study the precise values of cdc_d.”

  • [Ald2011-open-d-gt-1] loc: arXiv PDF p.2, Introduction. quote: “No best constants are known for dimensions larger than one.”

  • [Lin2026] Lin, Yongxi. Bounds 1.6855 and 3.879 for the planar centred Hardy-Littlewood maximal constant over squares. Lean 4 formalization, GitHub at commit 8e1ee3d, registered on the Palomar registry as PALOMAR-2026-09-19-000002 (2026).

  • [Lin2026-construction] loc: README.md (section The construction) and docs/PROOF.md. note: The Lean statement CenteredMaximal.ofReal_phi_le_weakTypeConstant_two uses closed cubes and the strict level set {Mf>α}\{Mf>\alpha\}, which gives the same constant as the non-strict level set used above. The compared theorems depend only on the axioms propext, Classical.choice and Quot.sound.

  • [Mel2003] Melas, Antonios D. The best constant for the centered Hardy–Littlewood maximal inequality. Annals of Mathematics (2) 157 (2003), no. 2, 647–688. DOI: 10.4007/annals.2003.157.647. Google Scholar. arXiv PDF

  • [Mel2003-c1-formula] loc: arXiv PDF p.3, Introduction (equation (1.8) and the following sentence). quote: “Hence (1.8) C=11+6112=1.5675208…C=\frac{11+\sqrt{61}}{12}=1.5675208\ldots is the largest solution of the quadratic equation (1.9) 12C2−22C+5=012C^2-22C+5=0.”

  • [Tao2010] Tao, Terence. 245A, Notes 5: Differentiation theorems. What's new, 16 October 2010. Blog post.

  • [Tao2010-ex42] loc: Exercise 42. quote: “Improve the constant 3d3^d in the Hardy-Littlewood maximal inequality to 2d2^d.”

  • [Tao2006] Tao, Terence. 247A Notes 3: Maximal theorem of Hardy-Littlewood. Lecture notes (Fall 2006). Google Scholar. Author PDF

  • [Tao2006-weak-3d] loc: Author PDF (notes3.pdf) p.3, end of proof of Theorem 1.2. quote: “and then on summing (1) we get (2) (with an explicit constant of 3d3^d).”

  • [Tao2006-cubes] loc: Author PDF (notes3.pdf) p.3, Remark 1.4. quote: “One can also replace balls by similar objects, such as cubes; the main property that one needs is that if two such objects overlap, then the smaller one is contained in some dilate of the larger.”

Progress & source assessment

Repository table (commit 2c1968c, 26 September 2026): best known lower bound 1.68550999; best known upper bound 3.879. Values marked with an asterisk have minimal verification.

Known upper bounds

Bound Reference Comments
99 [Tao2006] The standard covering-lemma proof gives an explicit constant 3d3^d in the weak-type (1,1)(1,1) inequality, and the same argument applies to cubes; hence c2≤32=9c_2\le 3^2=9. [Tao2006-weak-3d] [Tao2006-cubes]
44 [Tao2010] The Vitali-covering proof can be sharpened from 3d3^d to 2d2^d by covering centers with (2+ε)(2+\varepsilon)-dilates of a disjoint subcollection and letting ε↓0\varepsilon\downarrow 0. The same argument applies to ℓ∞\ell_\infty balls, i.e. axis-parallel cubes; hence c2≤22=4c_2\le 2^2=4. [Tao2010-ex42]
3.8793.879 [Lin2026] Comparison with an explicit kernel for the Cauchy generator A=−∣Du∣−∣Dv∣A=-\lvert D_u\rvert-\lvert D_v\rvert. In the diamond radius r=∣u∣+∣v∣r=\lvert u\rvert+\lvert v\rvert, the kernel K=(R/r−1)+/(R−1)−ε(1−r)+2K=(R/r-1)_+/(R-1)-\varepsilon(1-r)_+^2 with R=3797/2000R=3797/2000 and ε=159411/200000\varepsilon=159411/200000 satisfies K≥1K\ge 1 on the unit diamond and AK≥0AK\ge 0 away from the origin, which gives c2≤3.879c_2\le 3.879. Formalized in Lean 4 as CenteredMaximal.weakTypeConstant_two_le_upper.

Known lower bounds

Bound Reference Comments
34−24+62≈1.6211915\dfrac{3}{4}-\dfrac{\sqrt{2}}{4}+\dfrac{\sqrt{6}}{2}\approx 1.6211915 [Ald2000] Aldaz's Proposition 1.4 gives a lower bound in every dimension n≥2n\ge 2. Specializing the formula to n=2n=2 gives the displayed value. [Ald2000-prop1.4]
11+6112≈1.5675208\dfrac{11+\sqrt{61}}{12}\approx 1.5675208 [Mel2003], [Ald2011] Melas proved c1=11+6112c_1=\dfrac{11+\sqrt{61}}{12}. Since cd+1≥cdc_{d+1}\ge c_d, we get c2≥c1c_2\ge c_1. [Mel2003-c1-formula] [Ald2011-monotone]
Φ≈1.6855099933\Phi\approx 1.6855099933 [Lin2026] Periodic measure: masses 11 and w=(17+422)/9w=(17+4\sqrt{22})/9 on alternating columns x=ihx=ih, rows y=jVy=jV, with h=(5+22)/6h=(5+\sqrt{22})/6 and V=h+1V=h+1. Its maximal function is at least 11 on a period cell except four open a×ba\times b slots, so Φ=(2hV−4ab)/(1+w)\Phi=(2hV-4ab)/(1+w), where u=(2+22)/3u=(2+\sqrt{22})/3, a=2h−2(2+w)/2−u/2a=2h-\sqrt{2(2+w)}/2-u/2 and b=V−2u/2−w/2b=V-\sqrt{2}u/2-\sqrt{w}/2. Formalized in Lean 4 and registered on Palomar. [Lin2026-construction]
References
  1. [1]Davis, Damek; Ivanisvili, Paata; Tao, Terence (maintainers). Optimization Constants in Mathematics, github.com/teorth/optimizationproblems (commit 2c1968c, 26 September 2026). — Centered Hardy-Littlewood maximal constant in dimension $2$ ($C_{47}$) linkApache-2.0 (repository license); constant pages reproduced with attribution; repository references retained.

Recorded progress

Add yours →

Nothing recorded yet. A pointer to a paper the entry is missing counts.

Machine attempts

0 recorded

Attempts run against the statement below and are recorded in full, including the failures. The point is to stop the next model — and the next person — from re-walking a road that is already known to end. Each attempt costs 25 credits.

No machine attempts recorded.

Sign in to run an attempt. New accounts start with enough credits for ten.

Discussion

0 notes

Notes are for clarifying the statement, flagging a missing reference, or recording why an approach fails. Claimed solutions belong in a submission, where they can be reviewed.

No notes yet.

Sign in to add a note.