OpenFrontiers
← Back to the index
OP-12072OpenNumber theory

Zaremba’s conjecture constant (C58C_{58})

Zaremba’s conjecture constant: determine C58C_{58} or improve its bounds; the repository records 5 (lower) and ∞\infty (upper).

Editorial MSC2020 classification. Original article codes and source evidence are recorded in the literature directory.

Licensed source statementAs of Repository table at commit 2c1968c (2026-09-26); open while the recorded lower and upper bounds differSource & evidence ↓

Problem statement

Zaremba’s conjecture concerns denominators of rational numbers b/d∈(0,1)b/d\in(0,1) whose finite continued fraction expansions have all partial quotients bounded by an absolute constant. [Kan2021-conj-reformulation]

Equivalently (in the standard notation of the subject), the conjecture predicts that there exists an integer A>1A>1 such that every positive integer appears among the denominators that admit a continued-fraction expansion with all partial quotients in {1,2,…,A}\{1,2,\ldots,A\}. [BK2014-conj-1.1-A5]

We define

C58 := AZar,C_{58}\ :=\ A_{\mathrm{Zar}},

where AZarA_{\mathrm{Zar}} is the least integer AA (if it exists) such that every positive integer dd occurs as a denominator of some reduced fraction b/db/d whose finite continued fraction has all partial quotients ≤A\le A. If no such AA exists, set AZar:=+∞A_{\mathrm{Zar}}:=+\infty.

Zaremba conjectured that A=5A=5 suffices, and moreover the A=4A=4 version is known to be false (explicit counterexamples d=54d=54 and d=150d=150 are known), giving the rigorous lower bound

AZar ≥ 5.A_{\mathrm{Zar}}\ \ge\ 5.

[Kan2021-A4-counterexamples]

The strongest proven result toward finiteness is that the conjecture holds for a density-one set of denominators: Bourgain–Kontorovich prove a density-one statement and record an explicit choice A=50A=50 for it. [BK2014-density-one] [BK2014-A50-suffices]

Huang later improved the density-one statement to partial quotients bounded by 55 (still for a density-one subset of denominators, not all integers). [Hua2015-density-one-A5]

Lean 4

Not yet attached

No Lean statement or proof is attached yet. Have a formalization? Share its source to add it to this problem.

Background

References (from the repository page)

  • [BK2014] Bourgain, Jean; Kontorovich, Alex. On Zaremba’s conjecture. Annals of Mathematics 180 (2014), no. 1, 137–196. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4007/annals.2014.180.1.3. arXiv PDF: https://arxiv.org/pdf/1107.3776.pdf. Google Scholar

  • [BK2014-conj-1.1-A5] loc: Annals PDF p.2, Sec. 1.1 quote: “That is, the conjecture predicts the existence of some integer A>1A > 1 so that D{1,2,...,A}=ND\{1,2,...,A\} = N. In fact, Zaremba suggested that A=5A = 5 may already be sufficient.”

  • [BK2014-applications] loc: Annals PDF p.2, Sec. 1.1 quote: “Zaremba’s conjecture has important applications to numerical integration and pseudorandom number generation”

  • [BK2014-density-one] loc: Annals PDF p.1, Abstract quote: “We confirm this conjecture for a set of density one.”

  • [BK2014-A50-suffices] loc: Annals PDF p.2, Sec. 1.1 quote: “In particular, A=50A = 50 suffices.”

  • [Hua2015] Huang, Shinn-Yih. An Improvement to Zaremba’s Conjecture. Geometric and Functional Analysis 25 (2015), 860–914. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00039-015-0327-6. arXiv PDF: https://arxiv.org/pdf/1310.3772.pdf. Google Scholar

  • [Hua2015-density-one-A5] loc: arXiv PDF p.1, Abstract quote: “We prove there exists a density one subset D⊂ND \subset \mathbb{N} such that each n∈Dn \in D is the denominator of a finite continued fraction with partial quotients bounded by 55.”

  • [Kan2021] Kan, I. D. A strengthening of the Bourgain–Kontorovich method: three new theorems. Sbornik: Mathematics 212 (2021), no. 7, 921–964. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1070/SM9437. PDF: https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1070/SM9437/pdf. Google Scholar

  • [Kan2021-unproved-50years] loc: Kan_2021_Sb._Math._212_921.pdf p.2, Sec. 1.1 quote: “The following unproved conjecture has challenged mathematicians for about 50 years.”

  • [Kan2021-conj-reformulation] loc: Kan_2021_Sb._Math._212_921.pdf p.2, Sec. 1.1 quote: “That is, every d≥1d \ge 1 is represented as the denominator of a finite continued fraction b/db/d with partial quotients bounded by AA.”

  • [Kan2021-A4-counterexamples] loc: Kan_2021_Sb._Math._212_921.pdf p.2, Sec. 1.1 quote: “In fact, Zaremba conjectured that A=5A = 5 is sufficient in his conjecture. Why exactly A=5A = 5? Because a similar conjecture for A=4A = 4 fails to hold for at least two values of dd, namely, d=54d = 54 and d=150d = 150 (no other counterexamples are known!).”

Progress & source assessment

Repository table (commit 2c1968c, 26 September 2026): best known lower bound 5; best known upper bound ∞\infty. Values marked with an asterisk have minimal verification.

Known upper bounds

No finite upper bound for AZarA_{\mathrm{Zar}} is currently known (the conjecture remains open). [Kan2021-unproved-50years]

Bound Reference Comments
+∞+\infty Trivial.

Known lower bounds

Bound Reference Comments
55 [Kan2021] The A=4A=4 version fails (counterexamples d=54,150d=54,150), so any universal bound must satisfy AZar≥5A_{\mathrm{Zar}}\ge 5. [Kan2021-A4-counterexamples]
References
  1. [1]Davis, Damek; Ivanisvili, Paata; Tao, Terence (maintainers). Optimization Constants in Mathematics, github.com/teorth/optimizationproblems (commit 2c1968c, 26 September 2026). — Zaremba’s conjecture constant ($C_{58}$) linkApache-2.0 (repository license); constant pages reproduced with attribution; repository references retained.

Recorded progress

Add yours →

Nothing recorded yet. A pointer to a paper the entry is missing counts.

Machine attempts

0 recorded

Attempts run against the statement below and are recorded in full, including the failures. The point is to stop the next model — and the next person — from re-walking a road that is already known to end. Each attempt costs 25 credits.

No machine attempts recorded.

Sign in to run an attempt. New accounts start with enough credits for ten.

Discussion

0 notes

Notes are for clarifying the statement, flagging a missing reference, or recording why an approach fails. Claimed solutions belong in a submission, where they can be reviewed.

No notes yet.

Sign in to add a note.