OpenFrontiers
← Back to the index
OP-12083OpenAnalysis

Korenblum's constant (C68C_{68})

Korenblum's constant: determine C68C_{68} or improve its bounds; the repository records 0.3554 (lower) and 0.6778994 (upper).

Editorial MSC2020 classification. Original article codes and source evidence are recorded in the literature directory.

Licensed source statementAs of Repository table at commit 2c1968c (2026-09-26); open while the recorded lower and upper bounds differSource & evidence ↓

Problem statement

Let D:={z∈C:∣z∣<1}\mathbb{D}:=\{z\in\mathbb{C}:\lvert z\rvert<1\}. The Bergman space A2(D)\mathcal{A}^2(\mathbb{D}) consists of analytic functions ff on D\mathbb{D} with

∥f∥2 := (1π∫D∣f(z)∣2 dA(z))1/2 < ∞,\lVert f\rVert_2\ :=\ \left(\frac{1}{\pi}\int_{\mathbb{D}} \lvert f(z)\rvert^2\,dA(z)\right)^{1/2}\ <\ \infty,

where dA(z)dA(z) denotes the Lebesgue area measure.

For c∈(0,1)c\in(0,1), write

A(c,1) := {z∈C: c<∣z∣<1}.A(c,1)\ :=\ \{z\in\mathbb{C}:\ c<\lvert z\rvert<1\}.

Korenblum's maximum principle asserts that there exists a constant κ∈(0,1)\kappa\in(0,1) such that whenever f,gf,g are analytic in D\mathbb{D} and

∣f(z)∣ ≤ ∣g(z)∣(z∈A(κ,1)),\lvert f(z)\rvert\ \le\ \lvert g(z)\rvert \qquad (z\in A(\kappa,1)),

one has ∥f∥2≤∥g∥2\lVert f\rVert_2\le \lVert g\rVert_2. [CS2015-def-kappa]

We define

C68 := κ,C_{68}\ :=\ \kappa,

where κ\kappa is the largest constant for which this implication holds (often called Korenblum's constant). [CS2015-def-kappa]

The cited literature gives

0.3554 < κ < 0.6778994.0.3554\ <\ \kappa\ <\ 0.6778994.

[CS2015-best-range] [Wang2025]

Lean 4

Not yet attached

No Lean statement or proof is attached yet. Have a formalization? Share its source to add it to this problem.

Background

References (from the repository page)

  • [CS2015] Chakraborty, S.; Solynin, A. Korenblum-Type Extremal Problems in Bergman Spaces. (2015). arXiv PDF: https://arxiv.org/pdf/1507.06356.pdf. Publisher: https://arxiv.org/abs/1507.06356. Google Scholar

  • [CS2015-def-kappa] loc: arXiv PDF p.1, Abstract quote: "for f, g∈A2(D)f,\ g\in A^2(D), there is a constant cc, 0<c<10<c<1 such that if ∣f(z)∣≤∣g(z)∣|f(z)|\le|g(z)| for all zz such that c<∣z∣<1c<|z|<1, then ∥f∥2≤∥g∥2\lVert f\rVert_2\le\lVert g\rVert_2."

  • [CS2015-best-range] loc: arXiv PDF p.2, Section 1 (History and recent results) quote: "In recent papers of Wang [26, 24] the best known bounds to date can be found which are, 0.28185<κ<0.67789940.28185<\kappa<0.6778994."

  • [Wang2008] Wang, Chunjie. Domination in the Bergman space and Korenblum's constant. Integral Equations and Operator Theory 61 (2008), 423-432. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00020-008-1587-4. Google Scholar

  • [Wang2011] Wang, Chunjie. Some results on Korenblum's maximum principle. Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications 373 (2011), 393-398. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmaa.2010.07.052. Google Scholar

  • [Wang2025] Wang, Chunjie. A lower bound on Korenblum's constant. Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society 153 (2025), 1209-1214. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1090/proc/17112. Google Scholar

Progress & source assessment

Repository table (commit 2c1968c, 26 September 2026): best known lower bound 0.3554; best known upper bound 0.6778994. Values marked with an asterisk have minimal verification.

Known upper bounds

Bound Reference Comments
11 Trivial from κ∈(0,1)\kappa\in(0,1).
0.67789940.6778994 [Wang2008] Published numerical upper bound recorded in the survey literature. [CS2015-best-range]

Known lower bounds

Bound Reference Comments
00 Trivial from κ>0\kappa>0.
0.281850.28185 [Wang2011] Published numerical lower bound recorded in the survey literature. [CS2015-best-range]
0.35540.3554 [Wang2025] Published numerical lower bound.
References
  1. [1]Davis, Damek; Ivanisvili, Paata; Tao, Terence (maintainers). Optimization Constants in Mathematics, github.com/teorth/optimizationproblems (commit 2c1968c, 26 September 2026). — Korenblum's constant ($C_{68}$) linkApache-2.0 (repository license); constant pages reproduced with attribution; repository references retained.

Recorded progress

Add yours →

Nothing recorded yet. A pointer to a paper the entry is missing counts.

Machine attempts

0 recorded

Attempts run against the statement below and are recorded in full, including the failures. The point is to stop the next model — and the next person — from re-walking a road that is already known to end. Each attempt costs 25 credits.

No machine attempts recorded.

Sign in to run an attempt. New accounts start with enough credits for ten.

Discussion

0 notes

Notes are for clarifying the statement, flagging a missing reference, or recording why an approach fails. Claimed solutions belong in a submission, where they can be reviewed.

No notes yet.

Sign in to add a note.