OpenFrontiers
← Back to the index
OP-3016Partially solvedQuantum information

Aaronson–Ambainis influential-variable conjecture

Do universal constants c,C>0c,C>0 exist such that every multilinear p:{−1,1}n→[0,1]p:\{-1,1\}^{n}\to[0,1] of degree d≥1d\ge1 and positive variance has some variable ii with Inf⁡i(p)≥c(Var⁡(p)/d)C\operatorname{Inf}_i(p)\ge c(\operatorname{Var}(p)/d)^C? Use the uniform measure and $\operatorname{I

Source-reported statusAs of 2026-09-04Source & evidence ↓

Problem statement

Do universal constants c,C>0c,C>0 exist such that every multilinear p:{−1,1}n→[0,1]p:\{-1,1\}^{n}\to[0,1] of degree d≥1d\ge1 and positive variance has some variable ii with Inf⁡i(p)≥c(Var⁡(p)/d)C\operatorname{Inf}_i(p)\ge c(\operatorname{Var}(p)/d)^C? Use the uniform measure and Inf⁡i(p)=E[(p(x)−p(x⊕i))2]/4\operatorname{Inf}_i(p)=\mathbb E[(p(x)-p(x^{\oplus i}))^2]/4.

Lean 4

Not yet attached

No Lean statement or proof is attached yet. Have a formalization? Share its source to add it to this problem.

Background

Here x⊕ix^{\oplus i} flips the iith sign. The conjecture is an exact analytic statement, independent of implementation costs. Aaronson–Ambainis show it would imply that a TT-query quantum algorithm's acceptance probability can be approximated within additive ε\varepsilon on a 1−δ1-\delta fraction of uniformly random Boolean inputs using poly⁡(T,1/ε,1/δ)\operatorname{poly}(T,1/\varepsilon,1/\delta) classical queries.

The full influential-variable conjecture remains open. Its simulation consequence concerns acceptance probabilities on most inputs; it is not a worst-case simulation theorem for every promise problem, nor a theorem that a classical algorithm samples the full quantum output distribution.

August 2026 preprints, moved here from A16: Blanc–Docter–Strassle–Tan prove an analogous acceptance-probability simulation for tt queries in dd parallel query rounds, with tO(d2)t^{O(d^2)} classical queries at fixed approximation and failure parameters. Liu–Mutreja independently establish constant-round and limited-adaptivity simulation results with different quantitative bounds. Constantly many oracle-query rounds are thus a positive restricted case; physical gate depth, unrestricted adaptive queries and sampling advantage are separate notions.

A16 retains the input/output/data-access comparison methods and the historical record; it is not counted as a second conjecture. Related: A1, A16.

Source disclosures

Blanc et al. report ChatGPT 5.4 use for literature search, note transcription, proof checking and copyediting; this is an author disclosure, not independent verification of the workflow. Source

Liu–Mutreja report that conversations with ChatGPT 5.5 Pro helped prove their constant-depth version and assisted with a main theorem's proof. Source

Progress & source assessment

Source catalogue review: 4 September 2026. Improved indicates partial progress, including qualified preprint claims.

preprint: Bounded-round acceptance-probability simulation on most uniform inputs, with t^{O(d^2)} classical queries at fixed error parameters. Evidence

preprint: Independent simulation results for constant-round and limited-adaptivity quantum query algorithms; sampling is a different target. Evidence

References
  1. [1]Aaronson & Ambainis, 'The need for structure in quantum speedups', Theory of Computing 10 (2014) link
  2. [2]Blanc, Docter, Strassle & Tan, 'Quantum Speedups Require Structure or Depth' (2026 preprint; FOCS 2026) link
  3. [3]Liu & Mutreja, 'Parallel Quantum Advantage with Limited Adaptivity Requires Structure' (2026 preprint) link

Recorded progress

Add yours →

Nothing recorded yet. A pointer to a paper the entry is missing counts.

Machine attempts

0 recorded

Attempts run against the statement below and are recorded in full, including the failures. The point is to stop the next model — and the next person — from re-walking a road that is already known to end. Each attempt costs 25 credits.

No machine attempts recorded.

Sign in to run an attempt. New accounts start with enough credits for ten.

Discussion

0 notes

Notes are for clarifying the statement, flagging a missing reference, or recording why an approach fails. Claimed solutions belong in a submission, where they can be reviewed.

No notes yet.

Sign in to add a note.