OpenFrontiers
← Back to the index
OP-3051OpenCondensed matter

Stability of fragmentation and many-body scars

For a specified constrained spin model, determine which fragmentation or scar diagnostics survive bounded local perturbations preserving its stated exact symmetries, and bound the system-size and perturbation dependence of memory or revival lifetimes.

Source-reported statusAs of 2026-09-04Source & evidence ↓

Problem statement

For a specified constrained spin model, determine which fragmentation or scar diagnostics survive bounded local perturbations preserving its stated exact symmetries, and bound the system-size and perturbation dependence of memory or revival lifetimes.

Lean 4

Not yet attached

No Lean statement or proof is attached yet. Have a formalization? Share its source to add it to this problem.

Background

Several distinct mechanisms let quantum systems evade the ETH paradigm: integrability (extensively many local conserved charges), many-body localization (emergent l-bits under disorder), Hilbert-space fragmentation (dynamical shattering of the state space into exponentially many disconnected sectors), quantum many-body scars (rare non-thermal eigenstates, as in the PXP/Rydberg model), and pseudolocal or non-Abelian conserved quantities.

What is known: Each mechanism has its own well-developed theory and diagnostic (level statistics, entanglement scaling, revivals, commutant algebras for fragmentation). Recent work (Moudgalya–Motrunich) organizes scars and fragmentation via commutant algebras, a promising unifying language. Integrability is understood via Bethe ansatz / Yang–Baxter structure.

The useful frontier is a stability theorem or counterexample for a fixed mechanism and perturbation class, not the existence of one language for every failure of ETH. Exact fragmentation, long-lived approximate conservation and rare eigenstate scars are distinct. A finite-time revival is not by itself a stable phase; the order of infinite-volume, long-time and vanishing-perturbation limits matters. MBL is treated separately in M4.

Progress & source assessment

Source catalogue review: 4 September 2026. Improved indicates partial progress, including qualified preprint claims.

References
  1. [1]Serbyn, Abanin, Papić, 'Quantum many-body scars and weak breaking of ergodicity', Nat. Phys. 17, 675 (2021) link
  2. [2]Moudgalya & Motrunich, 'Hilbert space fragmentation and commutant algebras', PRX 12, 011050 (2022) link

Recorded progress

Add yours →

Nothing recorded yet. A pointer to a paper the entry is missing counts.

Machine attempts

0 recorded

Attempts run against the statement below and are recorded in full, including the failures. The point is to stop the next model — and the next person — from re-walking a road that is already known to end. Each attempt costs 25 credits.

No machine attempts recorded.

Sign in to run an attempt. New accounts start with enough credits for ten.

Discussion

0 notes

Notes are for clarifying the statement, flagging a missing reference, or recording why an approach fails. Claimed solutions belong in a submission, where they can be reviewed.

No notes yet.

Sign in to add a note.