OpenFrontiers
← Back to the index

Finite-resource entanglement in continuum QFT

For specified local algebras, spacetime separation and energy/work budgets, bound entanglement distillation and catalytic embezzlement yields and errors under physically implementable local operations, including mixed states.

Source-reported statusAs of 2026-09-04Source & evidence ↓

Problem statement

For specified local algebras, spacetime separation and energy/work budgets, bound entanglement distillation and catalytic embezzlement yields and errors under physically implementable local operations, including mixed states.

Lean 4

Not yet attached

No Lean statement or proof is attached yet. Have a formalization? Share its source to add it to this problem.

Background

Local algebras in standard relativistic continuum QFT are typically type III. They have no intrinsic regional trace and density-matrix entropy of the finite-dimensional tensor-product kind. Cutoff entropies can diverge from short-distance correlations across the boundary; this does not prevent algebraic states or operational entanglement from being defined.

What is known: Modular theory and Araki relative entropy give regulator-independent tools. Relative entropy is an extended-valued quantity, not always finite; mutual information is finite only under appropriate state/region hypotheses. Longo–Xu rigorously calculate examples and their singular limits, including divergence as interval boundaries meet. Neither quantity should be described as unconditionally UV finite.

Published progress (2025): van Luijk, Stottmeister, Werner and Wilming formulate LOCC for commuting von Neumann algebras and extend Nielsen's pure-state conversion theorem to arbitrary factors. Under the stated Haag-duality assumptions, type III pure states can be converted into one another to arbitrary accuracy by LOCC; for type III_1 local operations without classical communication suffice. Universal entanglement embezzlement further shows how unconstrained algebraic operations can trivialize conversion costs.

The missing step is therefore not an unrestricted pure-state formalism. Fix an admissible finite-energy operation model and ask for matching bounds on work, localization, separation, output entanglement and approximation error. Determine which mixed-state and gauge-constrained resources remain accessible, and whether predictions have regulator-independent limits. Related: QF9, QF11, F7.

Progress & source assessment

Source catalogue review: 4 September 2026. Improved indicates partial progress, including qualified preprint claims.

published: LOCC and a generalized Nielsen theorem exist for arbitrary factors; unrestricted type-III pure-state conversion is characterized under Haag duality, without imposing finite-energy operation costs. Evidence

References
  1. [1]Witten, 'Notes on some entanglement properties of quantum field theory', Rev. Mod. Phys. 90, 045003 (2018) link
  2. [2]Faulkner, Leigh, Parrikar & Wang, 'Modular Hamiltonians for Deformed Half-Spaces and the Averaged Null Energy Condition' (2016) link
  3. [3]Ceyhan & Faulkner, 'Recovering the QNEC from the ANEC', Comm. Math. Phys. (2020) link
  4. [4]van Luijk, Stottmeister, Werner & Wilming, 'Pure State Entanglement and von Neumann Algebras', CMP (2025) link
  5. [5]van Luijk et al., 'Embezzlement of entanglement, quantum fields, and the classification of von Neumann algebras' link
  6. [6]Longo & Xu, 'Relative Entropy in CFT', Advances in Mathematics 337 (2018) link

Recorded progress

Add yours →

Nothing recorded yet. A pointer to a paper the entry is missing counts.

Machine attempts

0 recorded

Attempts run against the statement below and are recorded in full, including the failures. The point is to stop the next model — and the next person — from re-walking a road that is already known to end. Each attempt costs 25 credits.

No machine attempts recorded.

Sign in to run an attempt. New accounts start with enough credits for ten.

Discussion

0 notes

Notes are for clarifying the statement, flagging a missing reference, or recording why an approach fails. Claimed solutions belong in a submission, where they can be reviewed.

No notes yet.

Sign in to add a note.