Does the two-dimensional Hubbard model superconduct?
The simplest model believed to capture high-temperature superconductivity, and its phase diagram is still contested.
28 entries matching the current filters. Sorted by recently added.
The simplest model believed to capture high-temperature superconductivity, and its phase diagram is still contested.
Proved in one dimension in 2007. In two dimensions it remains the central structural conjecture of the field.
The answer is 7 when the dimension is a prime power. In dimension 6 nobody can get past 3.
Numerically found in every dimension tried, exactly constructed in many, and proved in none in general.
Is estimating the ground state energy of a local Hamiltonian to constant relative precision still QMA-hard?
Depth-3 networks can express functions depth-2 cannot. Whether training can find them is a different question, and it is open.
For linear models the answer is a clean minimum-norm statement. For anything deeper, there is no general theory.
Santos disproved the linear bound in 2010. Whether the diameter is polynomially bounded is still unknown.
The minimal assumption of modern cryptography, and it has never been proved from anything weaker than itself.
Held–Karp has stood since 1962. No exact algorithm is known with running time O(1.99^n).
Babai's quasipolynomial algorithm moved the problem, but the gap to polynomial time remains.
After fifty years, the best known bound for any function in NP is about 3.1n gates.
Is there any truly subquadratic algorithm for finding three numbers summing to zero?
Are splay trees within a constant factor of the best possible binary search tree, on every access sequence?
Is deterministic communication complexity polylogarithmic in the rank of the communication matrix?
Widely believed to be equal, and provably tied to circuit lower bounds nobody can prove.
Every improvement since 1969 has shaved digits off 2.37. Nobody can rule out 2 + o(1), and nobody can achieve it.
Half of it was proved in 2018. Whether the full statement holds decides the approximability of dozens of problems at once.
The hexagonal lattice constant is √(2+√2). Nobody knows the value for the square lattice.
Smirnov proved it for the triangular lattice in 2001. The square lattice remains untouched.
Can a countable first-order theory have strictly between ℵ₀ and 2^ℵ₀ countable models?
Can two real numbers be simultaneously badly approximable in the multiplicative sense?
How many unit balls can touch a central unit ball in R^5? Somewhere between 40 and 44.
Dimensions 1, 2, 3, 8 and 24 are settled. Dimension 4 is not, and the conjectured answer is the D4 lattice.
A single finite number nobody knows: the bounds are 43 and 46, and the answer is widely believed to be 43.