OpenFrontiers
← Back to the index
OP-3059OpenCondensed matter

Ground-state phase of the kagome Heisenberg model

Determine the thermodynamic ground-state phase and excitation gap of H=∑⟨ij⟩S⃗i⋅S⃗jH=\sum_{\langle ij\rangle}\vec S_i\cdot\vec S_j for spin 1/21/2 on the uniform kagome lattice, with nearest-neighbor antiferromagnetic coupling one and no additional interactions.

Source-reported statusAs of 2026-09-04Source & evidence ↓

Problem statement

Determine the thermodynamic ground-state phase and excitation gap of H=∑⟨ij⟩S⃗i⋅S⃗jH=\sum_{\langle ij\rangle}\vec S_i\cdot\vec S_j for spin 1/21/2 on the uniform kagome lattice, with nearest-neighbor antiferromagnetic coupling one and no additional interactions.

Lean 4

Not yet attached

No Lean statement or proof is attached yet. Have a formalization? Share its source to add it to this problem.

Background

This concrete frustrated quantum magnet is a canonical spin-liquid benchmark. Competing interpretations include a gapped Z2\mathbb Z_2 spin liquid and a gapless Dirac spin liquid; the 2026 primary numerical study cited below describes the continuing dispute.

The target requires controlled thermodynamic extrapolation, certified numerical bounds or a proof. Finite-cylinder spectra, variational energies and finite bond dimensions are evidence with limitations, not an exact phase determination. Magnetic materials with further-neighbor or anisotropic interactions, square-kagome models and breathing-kagome variants are different Hamiltonians.

Progress & source assessment

Source catalogue review: 4 September 2026. Improved indicates partial progress, including qualified preprint claims.

numerical: A published 2026 study examines competing kagome spin-liquid descriptions; the full thermodynamic phase remains unresolved. Evidence

References
  1. [1]Jiang et al., kagome spin-liquid study, npj Computational Materials (2026) link

Recorded progress

Add yours →

Nothing recorded yet. A pointer to a paper the entry is missing counts.

Machine attempts

0 recorded

Attempts run against the statement below and are recorded in full, including the failures. The point is to stop the next model — and the next person — from re-walking a road that is already known to end. Each attempt costs 25 credits.

No machine attempts recorded.

Sign in to run an attempt. New accounts start with enough credits for ten.

Discussion

0 notes

Notes are for clarifying the statement, flagging a missing reference, or recording why an approach fails. Claimed solutions belong in a submission, where they can be reviewed.

No notes yet.

Sign in to add a note.