OpenFrontiers
← Back to the index
OP-4799Status unassessedNumber theory

Error term improvement

TheoremDB P10194 · Candidate awaiting source review

Inferred from the community field; finer classification has not been reviewed.

Source candidate · not reviewedAs of 2026-09-08Source & evidence ↓
Some source formulas need transcription review

The imported text contains notation that could not be rendered reliably. Check the original source before using the affected formulas. The source text is retained below for inspection.

Can the exponent $1/6$ in the error term of the Bateman–Grosswald asymptotic be improved
unconditionally? That is, is there $\delta > 0$ such that
$$Q(x) = \frac{\zeta(3/2)}{\zeta(3)} x^{1/2} + \frac{\zeta(2/3)}{\zeta(2)} x^{1/3} +
O(x^{1/6 - \delta})?$$
Improvements are known under the Riemann Hypothesis.

Source-reported assessment, retrieved 8 September 2026. Frontier Science has not independently reviewed this status.

Open. No signed Lean verification is attached to this problem or its selected resolution.

This record is in the source backlog; its novelty and unresolved status have not passed source review.

Problem statement

Can the exponent 1/61/6 in the error term of the Bateman–Grosswald asymptotic be improved unconditionally? That is, is there δ>0\delta > 0 such that

O(x^{1/6 - \delta})?$$ Improvements are known under the Riemann Hypothesis.

Lean 4

No Lean submitted

Formal statement

Lean 4
theorem error_term_improvement :
    answer(sorry) ↔ ∃ δ > (0 : ℝ),
      (fun x : ℝ => (Q x : ℝ) - A * x ^ ((1 : ℝ) / 2) - B * x ^ ((1 : ℝ) / 3)) =O[atTop]
        fun x => x ^ ((1 : ℝ) / 6 - δ)

On-site verification needs an executable Lean target. None is attached yet.

A source attachment or link is not a verified proof. The statement’s correspondence with the original question needs human review.

Proofs & verification

No Lean has been submitted for this problem yet. A Lean file can be attached to a submission for review, though with no target here it cannot be machine-checked.

Progress & source assessment

Source-reported assessment, retrieved 8 September 2026. Frontier Science has not independently reviewed this status.

Open. No signed Lean verification is attached to this problem or its selected resolution.

This record is in the source backlog; its novelty and unresolved status have not passed source review.

References
  1. [1]TheoremDB P10194 link
  2. [2]Source formal statement (not locally verified) link

Recorded progress

Add yours →

Nothing recorded yet. A pointer to a paper the entry is missing counts.

Machine attempts

0 recorded

Attempts run against the statement below and are recorded in full, including the failures. The point is to stop the next model — and the next person — from re-walking a road that is already known to end. Each attempt costs 25 credits.

No machine attempts recorded.

Sign in to run an attempt. New accounts start with enough credits for ten.

Discussion

0 notes

Notes are for clarifying the statement, flagging a missing reference, or recording why an approach fails. Claimed solutions belong in a submission, where they can be reviewed.

No notes yet.

Sign in to add a note.