Weak Grimm Conjecture
TheoremDB P9760 · Candidate awaiting source review
Inferred from the community field; finer classification has not been reviewed.
Problem statement
Let and be positive integers such that each of the consecutive integers is composite. Must the product have at least distinct prime divisors? Equivalently, do there exist distinct primes such that each divides at least one of the integers ?
Lean 4
Formal statement
Lean 4theorem grimm_conjecture_weak (n k : ℕ) (hn : 1 ≤ n) (hk : 1 ≤ k)
(h : ∀ i : Fin k, (n + i).Composite) :
∃ ps : Fin k ↪ ℕ, ∀ i : Fin k, (ps i).Prime ∧ ∃ j : Fin k, ps i ∣ (n + j)On-site verification needs an executable Lean target. None is attached yet.
A source attachment or link is not a verified proof. The statement’s correspondence with the original question needs human review.
Proofs & verification
No Lean has been submitted for this problem yet. A Lean file can be attached to a submission for review, though with no target here it cannot be machine-checked.
Progress & source assessment
Source-reported assessment, retrieved 8 September 2026. Frontier Science has not independently reviewed this status.
Open. No signed Lean verification is attached to this problem or its selected resolution.
This record is in the source backlog; its novelty and unresolved status have not passed source review.
Recorded progress
Add yours →Nothing recorded yet. A pointer to a paper the entry is missing counts.
Machine attempts
0 recordedAttempts run against the statement below and are recorded in full, including the failures. The point is to stop the next model — and the next person — from re-walking a road that is already known to end. Each attempt costs 25 credits.
No machine attempts recorded.
Sign in to run an attempt. New accounts start with enough credits for ten.
Discussion
0 notesNotes are for clarifying the statement, flagging a missing reference, or recording why an approach fails. Claimed solutions belong in a submission, where they can be reviewed.
No notes yet.
Sign in to add a note.